Characterization of biopolymers produced by planktonic and biofilm cells ofHerbaspirillum lusitanumP6‐12

AIMS The goal of this study was to characterize biopolymers from two modes of the Herbaspirillum lusitanum P6-12 growth: planktonic, in which cells are free swimming, and biofilm life style, in which the cells are sessile. METHODS AND RESULTS Differences in biopolymers composition from planktonic and biofilm cells of H. lusitanum strain P6-12 were analysed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, gas-liquid chromatography and spectrophotometry. A high degree of polymer separation and purification was achieved by ultracentrifugation, and column chromatography allowed us to identify the chemical differences between biopolymers from biofilm and planktonic H. lusitanum. It was shown that planktonic cells of H. lusitanum P6-12 when cultivated in a liquid medium to the end of the exponential phase of growth, produced two high-molecular-weight glycoconjugates (were arbitrarily called CPS-I and CPS-II) of a lipopolysaccharide (LPS) nature and a lipid-polysacharide complex (were arbitrarily called EPS). The EPS, CPS-I, CPS-II had different monosaccharide and lipid compositions. The extracellular polymeric matrix (EPM) produced by the biofilm cells was mostly proteinaceous, with a small amount of carbohydrates (up to 3%). From the biofilm culture medium, a free extracellular polymeric substance (was arbitrarily called fEPS) was obtained that contained proteins and carbohydrates (up to 7%). The cells outside the biofilm had capsules containing high-molecular-weight glycoconjugate (was arbitrarily called CPSFBC ) that consisted of carbohydrates (up to 10%), proteins (up to 16%) and lipids (up to 70%). CONCLUSIONS During biofilm formation, the bacteria secreted surface biopolymers that differed from those of the planktonic cells. The heterogeneity of the polysaccharide containing biopolymers of the H. lusitanum P6-12 surface is probably conditioned by their different functions in plant colonization and formation of an efficient symbiosis, as well as in cell adaptation to existence in plant tissues. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY The results of the study permit a better understanding of the physiological properties of the biopolymers, for example, in plant-microbe interactions.