Back to Search Start Over

Some undesirable traps which can mislead the pathologist

Authors :
Guillaume Desoubeaux
Victor Mercier
Damien Sizaret
Simon Benzimra
Samia Gonzalez
Milène Sasso
Pascal Kouyoumdjian
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes)
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD [France-Sud])
Université de Montpellier (UM)
Service d'Anatomopathologie [Tours]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU Tours)
Laboratoire Biolab 33 Floirac
Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau [Nîmes] (CHU Nîmes)
Hôpital Bretonneau
Centre d’Etude des Pathologies Respiratoires (CEPR), UMR 1100 (CEPR)
Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Source :
Journal of Clinical Pathology, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2021, 74 (9), pp.568-570. ⟨10.1136/jclinpath-2021-207438⟩
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

International audience; In clinical laboratories, the diagnosis of parasite diseases can sometimes be challenging for non-expert microbiologists. Indeed, in spite of the advent of the molecular biology, macroscopic and microscopic examinations still remain essential. Nonetheless, it is usually not automated and requires great skills to complete the correct diagnosis. It is not infrequent that inert elements mislead to erroneous diagnoses. Through three different concrete examples, this article aims at underscoring the actual risk of parasite misidentification and at highlighting the systematic approach to be conducted in order to enable reliable diagnosis.

Details

ISSN :
14724146 and 00219746
Volume :
74
Issue :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of clinical pathology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b9122f2947ea2cbb22e2cadeea6bbf53