Back to Search Start Over

Prediction of peak oxygen uptake from ratings of perceived exertion during a sub-maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Authors :
Claire Tourny
Jeremy Coquart
Jean-Marie Grosbois
Frédéric Lemaître
Roger G. Eston
Frédéric Bart
Centre d’études des transformations des activités physiques et sportives (CETAPS)
Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN)
Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société (IRIHS)
Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN)
Normandie Université (NU)
Département de Chimie - ENS Paris
École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris)
Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)
Coquart, Jérémy BJ
Eston, Roger G
Lemaître, Frédéric
Bart, Frédéric
Tourny, Claire
Grosbois, Jean-Marie
Source :
European Journal of Applied Physiology, European Journal of Applied Physiology, Springer Verlag, 2015, 115 (2), pp.365-372. ⟨10.1007/s00421-014-3023-6⟩
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

We assessed the validity of predicting peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O2 peak) from the relationship between oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O2) and overall ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) obtained during the initial stages of a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET).Fifteen healthy participants and 18 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) performed a maximal CPET, during which [Formula: see text]O2 and RPE were measured until RPE15.Individual regressions between [Formula: see text]O2 and RPE ≤ 15 were extrapolated to RPE19 to predict [Formula: see text]O2 peak. Mean actual and predicted [Formula: see text]O2 peak were not significantly different in healthy women (18.9 ± 4.1 vs. 20.4 ± 4.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1), respectively) and men (28.9 ± 7.8 vs. 29.7 ± 8.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1), respectively), or in women (15.2 ± 4.7 vs. 15.8 ± 5.0 mL kg(-1) min(-1), respectively) and men (16.2 ± 4.4 vs. 17.4 ± 5.4 mL kg(-1) min(-1), respectively) with COPD (P = 0.067). Moreover, actual and predicted [Formula: see text]O2 peak were highly correlated in healthy participants and COPD patients (r ≥ 0.89; P0.001). The bias and 95 % limits of agreement were -1.0 ± 4.0 and -1.0 ± 4.6 mL kg(-1) min(-1) for healthy and COPD participants, respectively.[Formula: see text]O2 peak can be predicted with acceptable accuracy in healthy participants and patients with COPD from the individual relationship between [Formula: see text]O2 and RPE ≤ 15.

Details

ISSN :
14396327 and 14396319
Volume :
115
Issue :
2
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European journal of applied physiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b846af8a8cbf4988093108a08ce99752
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-3023-6⟩