Back to Search
Start Over
Clinical evaluation of a dose management system-integrated 3D skin dose map by comparison with radiochromic films
- Source :
- European Radiology, European Radiology, Springer Verlag, 2020, 30 (9), pp.5071-5081. ⟨10.1007/s00330-020-06877-8⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2020.
-
Abstract
- To validate the performance of an automatic tool to estimate a patient’s peak skin dose (PSD) and a skin dose map from data collected by a radiation dose management system (RDMS) during interventional procedures. In total, 288 eligible consecutive patients undergoing abdominopelvic embolisation or planned coronary angioplasty using radiochromic films were screened between June 2018 and March 2019. For 98 included patients, PSD was measured using radiochromic films (PSDFilm) and computed by RDMS (PSDRDMS) using one flat and two anthropomorphic phantoms. Statistical concordance between PSDFilm and PSDRDMS was computed with Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient and clinical concordance with the Bland and Altman graphic; values were compared using the paired Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. In total, 190/288 patients were excluded and 98 patients were analysed (69 men, mean age 66 ± 14 years). The PSDFilm median (1st; 3rd quartile) was 0.59 Gy (0.40; 1.08). PSDRDMS was 0.62 Gy (0.43; 1.22) for the flat phantom and 0.62 Gy (0.42; 1.19) for anthropomorphic phantoms. The concordance between PSDFilm and PSDRDMS was good for both phantoms (flat: 0.94 [0.91; 0.95]; anthropomorphic 0.94 [0.91; 0.96]). Compared with the values of PSDFilm, the values of PSDRDMS were significantly increased by 5% (− 4%; 16%) for flat phantom (p = 0.001) and 7% (− 6%; 22%) for anthropomorphic phantoms (p = 0.002) for vascular procedures and 9% (− 4%; 26%, p = 0.01) and 6% (− 4%; 23%, p = 0.02) for cardiac procedures, respectively. Dose map representations matched for most patients. The gaps identified were due to table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of a wedge filter. The RDMS skin dose map tool allowed the computation of the PSD and skin dose distribution for all patients with fewer constraints than radiochromic films. However, the computed PSD was overestimated, increasing the number of patients requiring follow-up. • A good concordance correlation was identified between the peak skin dose (PSD) values measured with radiochromic films and estimated with the radiation dose management system (RDMS) skin dose map tool. • Differences were related to table displacement during fluoroscopy events and the use of a wedge filter, which are not accounted in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine Radiation Dose Structured Reports. • For all procedures, the estimated PSDs were significantly higher than the measured PSDs by 5% (− 4%; 18%) for flat phantom (p
- Subjects :
- Male
MESH: Radiation Dosimeters
interventional
Coronary Angiography
MESH: Embolization, Therapeutic / methods
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
MESH: Radiometry / methods
0302 clinical medicine
MESH: Aged, 80 and over
Medicine
Fluoroscopy
Skin
Aged, 80 and over
medicine.diagnostic_test
Phantoms, Imaging
Physics
Ultrasound
Interventional radiology
General Medicine
Middle Aged
Skin dose
Embolization, Therapeutic
3. Good health
[STAT]Statistics [stat]
Concordance correlation coefficient
Quartile
Film dosimetry
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Female
Radiology
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
MESH: Radiation Dosage
Concordance
Radiation Dosage
Imaging phantom
03 medical and health sciences
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
MESH: Skin
[SDV.MHEP.CSC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Cardiology and cardiovascular system
[INFO.INFO-IM]Computer Science [cs]/Medical Imaging
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Radiometry
Aged
Radiation Dosimeters
business.industry
MESH: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / methods
MESH: Coronary Angiography
MESH: Phantoms, Imaging
[SDV.SPEE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie
business
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09387994 and 14321084
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Radiology, European Radiology, Springer Verlag, 2020, 30 (9), pp.5071-5081. ⟨10.1007/s00330-020-06877-8⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b842221c1be50c7139cf12d28c7cc541