Cite
The stability and reliability of attentional bias measures in the dot-probe task: Evidence from both traditional mean bias scores and trial-level bias scores
MLA
Lin Fang, and Joshua M. Carlson. “The Stability and Reliability of Attentional Bias Measures in the Dot-Probe Task: Evidence from Both Traditional Mean Bias Scores and Trial-Level Bias Scores.” Motivation and Emotion, vol. 44, May 2020, pp. 657–69. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09834-6.
APA
Lin Fang, & Joshua M. Carlson. (2020). The stability and reliability of attentional bias measures in the dot-probe task: Evidence from both traditional mean bias scores and trial-level bias scores. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09834-6
Chicago
Lin Fang, and Joshua M. Carlson. 2020. “The Stability and Reliability of Attentional Bias Measures in the Dot-Probe Task: Evidence from Both Traditional Mean Bias Scores and Trial-Level Bias Scores.” Motivation and Emotion 44 (May): 657–69. doi:10.1007/s11031-020-09834-6.