Back to Search Start Over

Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter

Authors :
Antonio Omuro
Alba A Brandes
Antoine F Carpentier
Ahmed Idbaih
David A Reardon
Timothy Cloughesy
Ashley Sumrall
Joachim Baehring
Martin van den Bent
Oliver Bähr
Giuseppe Lombardi
Paul Mulholland
Ghazaleh Tabatabai
Ulrik Lassen
Juan Manuel Sepulveda
Mustafa Khasraw
Elodie Vauleon
Yoshihiro Muragaki
Anna Maria Di Giacomo
Nicholas Butowski
Patrick Roth
Xiaozhong Qian
Alex Z Fu
Yanfang Liu
Von Potter
Alexandros-Georgios Chalamandaris
Kay Tatsuoka
Michael Lim
Michael Weller
Neurology
Source :
Neuro-Oncology, 25(1), 123-134. Oxford University Press
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150–200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS. Results A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively. Conclusions The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15228517
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Neuro-Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b68a372718b84388b72b49366cf2a9da