Back to Search
Start Over
New diagnostic reference level for full-field digital mammography units
- Source :
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 157:181-192
- Publication Year :
- 2013
- Publisher :
- Oxford University Press (OUP), 2013.
-
Abstract
- The diagnostic reference level (DRL) has generally been defined as the 75th percentile of the distributions of mean doses observed on a sample of standard-sized patients, but for mammography, the 95th percentile has been used. In this study, the 75th and 95th percentiles are estimated for 26 full-field digital mammography units, representing six models from four manufacturers. Systematic differences between categories of manufacture/models are investigated with respect to mean glandular dose (MGD) and figure of merit (FOM), defined as signal difference to noise ratio squared divided by the MGD. The MGDs per unit range from 0.7 to 2.1 mGy, with overall 75th and 95th percentiles of 1.4 and 2.0 mGy, respectively. The different manufacture/models show differences in both dose distributions and FOMs. As national DRL, the 95th percentile is proposed to determine which units can be accepted for use. To identify the need for optimisation, it is proposed to use the 75th percentile for the different manufacture/models, along with the FOM.
- Subjects :
- Percentile
Digital mammography
Breast Neoplasms
Dose distribution
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Monitoring
Reference Values
Reference level
Statistics
medicine
Range (statistics)
Humans
Polymethyl Methacrylate
Mammography
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Mathematics
Radiation
Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
medicine.diagnostic_test
Phantoms, Imaging
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
General Medicine
Full field digital mammography
Radiographic Image Enhancement
Reference values
Female
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 17423406 and 01448420
- Volume :
- 157
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Radiation Protection Dosimetry
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b67416d1106fbffd68afdbee662ed3c7
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/nct136