Back to Search Start Over

Phase I Study of Venetoclax Plus Daratumumab and Dexamethasone, With or Without Bortezomib, in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma With and Without t(11;14)

Authors :
Annette Juul Vangsted
Abdullah A. Masud
Jeremy A. Ross
Simon J. Harrison
Shir-Jing Ho
Torben Plesner
Hang Quach
Nizar J. Bahlis
Rachid Baz
Orlando F. Bueno
Sheryl Coppola
Xiaoqing Yang
Simon D. J. Gibbs
Jonathan L. Kaufman
Philippe Moreau
Source :
Bahlis, N J, Baz, R, Harrison, S J, Quach, H, Ho, S J, Vangsted, A J, Plesner, T, Moreau, P, Gibbs, S D, Coppola, S, Yang, X, Al Masud, A, Ross, J A, Bueno, O & Kaufman, J L 2021, ' Phase I Study of Venetoclax Plus Daratumumab and Dexamethasone, With or Without Bortezomib, in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma With and Without t(11;14) ', Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, vol. 39, no. 32, pp. 3602-3612 . https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.00443
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

PURPOSE Venetoclax is an oral BCL-2 inhibitor with single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with t(11;14) translocation. Venetoclax efficacy in RRMM may be potentiated through combination with agents including bortezomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab. METHODS This phase I study ( NCT03314181 ) evaluated venetoclax with daratumumab and dexamethasone (VenDd) in patients with t(11;14) RRMM and VenDd with bortezomib (VenDVd) in cytogenetically unselected patients with RRMM. Primary objectives included expansion-phase dosing, safety, and overall response rate. Secondary objectives included further safety analysis, progression-free survival, duration of response, time to progression, and minimal residual disease negativity. RESULTS Forty-eight patients were enrolled, 24 each in parts 1 (VenDd) and 2 (VenDVd). There was one dose-limiting toxicity in part 1 (grade 3 febrile neutropenia, 800 mg VenDd). Common adverse events with VenDd and VenDVd included diarrhea (63% and 54%) and nausea (50% and 50%); grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 88% in the VenDd group and 71% in the VenDVd group. One treatment-emergent death occurred in part 2 (sepsis) in the context of progressive disease, with no other infection-related deaths on study with medians of 20.9 and 20.4 months of follow-up in parts 1 and 2, respectively. The overall response rate was 96% with VenDd (all very good partial response or better [≥ VGPR]) and 92% with VenDVd (79% ≥ VGPR). The 18-month progression-free survival rate was 90.5% (95% CI, 67.0 to 97.5) with VenDd and 66.7% (95% CI, 42.5 to 82.5) with VenDVd. CONCLUSION VenDd and VenDVd produced a high rate of deep and durable responses in patients with RRMM. These results support continued evaluation of venetoclax with daratumumab regimens to treat RRMM, particularly in those with t(11;14).

Details

ISSN :
15277755
Volume :
39
Issue :
32
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b60661302a7ea9152573f073b9a8edd6