Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Conceptions of Radian Angle Measure

Radian angle measure is central to learning trigonometry, with researchers providing evidence that a coherent understanding of radian contributes to a coherent understanding of trigonometric and inverse trigonometric functions. However, there are few opportunities for students to engage with curricular situations that involve radian angle measure. The purpose of this dissertation is to explore and provide insights into preservice mathematics teachers’ (PMTs’) conceptions of radian angle measure using three curricular situations. The first chapter reviews the relevant literature, which reported that PMTs’ conceptions of radian angle measure involve angles measured in terms of π, in relation to degrees, and in relation to the unit circle. In chapter two, I explored PMTs’ conceptions of radian angle measure using textbook representations. Seven PMTs participated in a think-aloud semi-structured interviews, where they defined radian angle measure from six textbook diagrams of radian, including a diagram of the unit circle. In chapter three, building on literature that reported that PMTs’ conceptions of radian angle measure involve relating radian to degrees, I explored how PMTs conceptualize this relationship. Five PMTs participated in semi-structured interviews, where they described radian angle measure given the angle measure in degrees. In chapter four, I explored the PMTs’ conceptions of radian angle measure given a novel context. Four PMTs participated in semi-structured virtual interviews, where they engaged with a digital activity that involves radian angle measure in the context of light reflection. Some of the dissertation’s findings align with previous research, where PMTs’ conceptualized radian angle measure in relation to the unit circle. However, this dissertation provides empirical evidence of why the PMTs refer to the unit circle. The PMTs acknowledged knowing the unit circle from memorization, but also explained that the purpose for using the unit circle is efficiency. At the same time, the PMTs acknowledged limitations in the unit circle and in their conceptions of it. Overall findings from the dissertation demonstrate the complexity of PMTs’ conceptions of radian angle measure. The PMTs’ conceptions were reported as concept definitions, ways of thinking, and spatial ways of thinking. The PMTs demonstrated flexibility with reasoning about radian angle measure using foundational conceptions in learning higher mathematics topics (e.g., proportional reasoning concepts, spatial ways of thinking). By positioning the PMTs as knowers and thinkers with valuable insights to provide, I was able to uncover and report a collection of conceptions that were demonstrated by PMTs when a curricular situation involved radian angle measure. The findings from this dissertation extend existing research that explored conceptions of angle measure and radian angle measure by reporting PMTs’ conceptions of radian angle measure given three different curricular situations. While there is still much that needs to be investigated about complexities in PMTs’ conceptions of radian angle measure, this dissertation represents one step toward providing insights about those complexities.