Back to Search Start Over

Typology of the Primary Outcome Construction in Dermatology: A Systematic Review of Published Randomized Controlled Trials

Authors :
Ludovic Martin
Alain Dupuy
Dany Nassar
Emilie Sbidian
Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
Laboratoire d'Investigation Clinique
Laboratoire d'Investigation Clinique (LIC)
Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)-Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)
Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne - Paris 12 (UPEC UP12)
Pôle Recherche Clinique-Santé Publique [Mondor]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Henri Mondor
Department of Dermatology
Université d'Angers (UA)
Centre d'Investigation Clinique [Rennes] (CIC)
Université de Rennes 1 (UR1)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Hôpital Pontchaillou-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Service de Dermatologie [Rennes] = Dermatology [Rennes]
CHU Pontchaillou [Rennes]
Université de Rennes (UR)-Hôpital Pontchaillou-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Source :
Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Nature Publishing Group, 2013, 133 (2), pp.371--376. ⟨10.1038/jid.2012.279⟩, Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 2013, 133 (2), pp.371--376. ⟨10.1038/jid.2012.279⟩
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2013.

Abstract

International audience; The primary outcome is a major component of a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and several types of outcome can be chosen in a given disease. We systematically reviewed RCTs on nonneoplastic dermatological diseases published in 2009 and referenced in Medline, and described how the main outcome was defined and constructed. We assessed whether those characteristics were associated with a clearly defined primary outcome and whether they were associated with a significant statistical test for the primary outcome. Outcome construction variables were the three "VIP" questions (V denoting Variable: binary vs. quantitative variable; I denoting Item: data collection based on multiple vs. single item(s); and P denoting time Points: outcome assessment based on a "final time point" vs. "final and initial time points"). Among 122 RCTs, 32% did not have a clearly defined primary outcome. In multivariable analyses, a clearly defined primary outcome was associated with a binary variable (odds ratio (OR)=6.7; 2.5-17.7) and the composite variable "both blinding/placebo-controlled arm" (OR=4.5; 1.8-11.2); a significant statistical test was associated with a "final time point"-based outcome construction (OR=2.6; 1.2-5.5). Our study points to areas of improvement related to the definition and construction of the primary outcome in RCTs in dermatology.

Details

ISSN :
0022202X and 15231747
Volume :
133
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b53ded2126c1c864f686762e4e3ffcf7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2012.279