Back to Search Start Over

Prospective Clinical Validation of Virtual Patient-Specific Quality Assurance of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Radiation Therapy Plans

Authors :
Phillip D.H. Wall
Emily Hirata
Olivier Morin
Gilmer Valdes
Alon Witztum
Source :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 113:1091-1102
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

Performing measurement-based patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) is recognized as a resource-intensive and time inefficient task in the radiation therapy treatment workflow. Paired with technological refinements in modern radiation therapy, research toward measurement-free PSQA has seen increased interest during the past 5 years. However, these efforts have not been clinically implemented or prospectively validated in the United States. We propose a virtual QA (VQA) system and workflow to assess the safety and workload reduction of measurement-free PSQA.An XGBoost machine learning model was designed to predict PSQA outcomes of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans, represented as percent differences between the measured ion chamber point dose in a phantom and the corresponding planned dose. The final model was deployed within a web application to predict PSQA outcomes of clinical plans within an existing clinical workflow. The application also displays relevant feature importance and plan-specific distribution analyses relative to database plans for documentation and to aid physicist interpretation and evaluation. VQA predictions were prospectively validated over 3 months of measurements at our clinic to assess safety and efficiency gains.Over 3 months, VQA predictions for 445 volumetric modulated arc therapy plans were prospectively validated at our institution. VQA predictions for these plans had a mean absolute error of 1.08% ± 0.77%, with a maximum absolute error of 2.98%. Using a 1% prediction threshold (ie, plans predicted to have an absolute error1% would not require a measurement) would yield a 69.2% reduction in QA workload, saving 32.5 hours per month on average, with 81.5% sensitivity, 72.4% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.81 at a 3% clinical threshold and 100% sensitivity, 70% specificity, and an area under the curve of 0.93 at a 4% clinical threshold.This is the first prospective clinical implementation and validation of VQA in the United States, which we observed to be efficient. Using a conservative threshold, VQA can substantially reduce the number of required measurements for PSQA, leading to more effective allocation of clinical resources.

Details

ISSN :
03603016
Volume :
113
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b49e9bc3d9f0e0ceaf902cf53e4b036a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.040