Back to Search Start Over

Continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilation improve survival in a neonatal swine model of asphyxial cardiac arrest

Authors :
George Giokas
Apostolos Papalois
Theodoros Xanthos
Nicoletta Iacovidou
Alexandros Douvanas
Afrodite Aggelina
Georgios Mavrovounis
Athanasios Chalkias
Ioannis Pantazopoulos
Source :
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 48:60-66
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Background Guidelines for neonatal resuscitation recommend a 3:1 compression to ventilation ratio. However, this recommendation is based on expert opinion and consensus rather than strong scientific evidence. Our primary aim was to assess whether continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations would increase return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) rate and survival compared to the 3:1 chest compression to ventilation ratio. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, laboratory study. Twenty male Landrace-Large White pigs, aged 1–4 days with an average weight 1.650 ± 228.3 g were asphyxiated and left untreated until heart rate was less than 60 bpm or mean arterial pressure was below 15 mmHg. Animals were then randomly assigned to receive either continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations (n = 10), or standard (3:1) chest compression to ventilation ratio (n = 10). Heart rate and arterial pressure were assessed every 30 s during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) until ROSC or asystole. All animals with ROSC were monitored for 4 h. Results Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) at 30 s of CPR was significantly higher in the experimental group (45.7 ± 16.9 vs. 21.8 ± 6 mmHg, p Conclusion Continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilations significantly improved CPP, ETCO2, time to ROSC, ROSC at 30 s and survival in a porcine model of neonatal resuscitation.

Details

ISSN :
07356757
Volume :
48
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b485de52b062a391b06efc13db1c3ab4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.009