Back to Search Start Over

A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: Safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity

Authors :
Franciscary Pi-Estopinan
Jorman Rubino-Moreno
Mayte Amoroto-Roig
Maria Teresa Perez-Guevara
Yury Valdés-Balbín
Laura M. Rodríguez-Noda
Marisel Martinez-Perez
Meiby de la Caridad Rodriguez-Gonzalez
Carmen M Valenzuela-Silva
Dagmar García-Rivera
Rolando Ochoa-Azze
Maura Tamayo-Rodriguez
Raul Gonzalez-Mugica
Vicente Verez-Bencomo
Yanet Chappi-Estevez
Yanet Climent-Ruiz
Belinda Sanchez-Ramirez
Beatriz Paredes-Moreno
Anamary Suarez-Batista
Gretchen Bergado-Baez
Tays Hernandez-Garcia
Alina Díaz-Machado
Alis Martín-Trujillo
Sonia Pérez-Rodríguez
Rocmira Perez-Nicado
Guang-Wu Chen
Marta Dubed-Echevarría
Carlos A. González-Delgado
Source :
Vaccine. 40:2068-2075
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2022.

Abstract

BackgroundThe Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is the target for many COVID-19 vaccines. Here we report results for phase 1 clinical trial of two COVID-19 vaccine candidates based on recombinant dimeric RBD (d-RBD).MethodsWe performed a randomized, double-blind, phase I clinical trial in the National Centre of Toxicology in Havana. Sixty Cuban volunteers aged 19-59 years were randomized into three groups (20 subjects each): 1) FINLAY-FR-1 (50 mcg d-RBD plus outer membrane vesicles from N. meningitidis); 2) FINLAY-FR-1A-50 mcg d-RBD (three doses); 3) FINLAY-FR-1A-25 mcg d-RDB (three doses). The FINLAY-FR-1 group was randomly divided to receive a third dose of the same vaccine candidate (homologous schedule) or of FINLAY-FR-1A-50 (heterologous schedule). The primary outcomes were safety and reactogenicity. The secondary outcome was vaccine immunogenicity. Humoral response at baseline and following each vaccination was evaluated using live-virus neutralization test, anti-RBD IgG ELISA and in-vitro neutralization test of RBD:hACE2 interaction.ResultsMost adverse events were of mild intensity (63.5%), solicited (58.8%), and local (61.8%); 69.4% with causal association with vaccination. Serious adverse events were not found. The FINLAY-FR-1 group reported more adverse events than the other two groups. After the third dose, anti-RBD seroconversion was 100%, 94.4% and 90% for the FINLAY-FR-1, FINLAY-FR-1A-50 and FINLAY-FR-1A-25 respectively. The in-vitro inhibition of RBD:hACE2 interaction increased after the second dose in all formulations. The geometric mean neutralizing titres after the third dose rose significantly in the group vaccinated with FINLAY-FR-1 with respect to the other formulations and the COVID-19 Convalescent Serum Panel. No differences were found between FINLAY-FR-1 homologous or heterologous schedules.ConclusionsVaccine candidates were safe and immunogenic, and induced live-virus neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. The highest values were obtained when outer membrane vesicles were used as adjuvant.Trial registryhttps://rpcec.sld.cu/en/trials/RPCEC00000338-En

Details

ISSN :
0264410X
Volume :
40
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Vaccine
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b445b9be96c36bcec3631c8577e62bff
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.02.029