Back to Search Start Over

Early cost-utility analysis of tissue-engineered heart valves compared to bioprostheses in the aortic position in elderly patients

Authors :
Shih Ting Chiu
Isaac Corro Ramos
Maureen P.M.H. Rutten-van Mölken
Carlijn V. C. Bouten
Johanna J.M. Takkenberg
Simone A. Huygens
Jolanda Kluin
Gary L. Grunkemeier
Cardiothoracic Surgery
ACS - Atherosclerosis & ischemic syndromes
ACS - Heart failure & arrhythmias
Cell-Matrix Interact. Cardiov. Tissue Reg.
ICMS Core
Health Technology Assessment (HTA)
Source :
European journal of health economics : HEPAC, 21(4), 557-572. Springer Verlag, European Journal of Health Economics, 21(4), 557-572. Springer, The European Journal Of Health Economics, 21(4), 557-572. Springer-Verlag, The European Journal of Health Economics
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer-Verlag, 2020.

Abstract

Objectives Aortic valve disease is the most frequent indication for heart valve replacement with the highest prevalence in elderly. Tissue-engineered heart valves (TEHV) are foreseen to have important advantages over currently used bioprosthetic heart valve substitutes, most importantly reducing valve degeneration with subsequent reduction of re-intervention. We performed early Health Technology Assessment of hypothetical TEHV in elderly patients (≥ 70 years) requiring surgical (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) to assess the potential of TEHV and to inform future development decisions. Methods Using a patient-level simulation model, the potential cost-effectiveness of TEHV compared with bioprostheses was predicted from a societal perspective. Anticipated, but currently hypothetical improvements in performance of TEHV, divided in durability, thrombogenicity, and infection resistance, were explored in scenario analyses to estimate quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain, cost reduction, headroom, and budget impact. Results Durability of TEHV had the highest impact on QALY gain and costs, followed by infection resistance. Improved TEHV performance (− 50% prosthetic valve-related events) resulted in lifetime QALY gains of 0.131 and 0.043, lifetime cost reductions of €639 and €368, translating to headrooms of €3255 and €2498 per hypothetical TEHV compared to SAVR and TAVI, respectively. National savings in the first decade after implementation varied between €2.8 and €11.2 million (SAVR) and €3.2–€12.8 million (TAVI) for TEHV substitution rates of 25–100%. Conclusions Despite the relatively short life expectancy of elderly patients undergoing SAVR/TAVI, hypothetical TEHV are predicted to be cost-effective compared to bioprostheses, commercially viable and result in national cost savings when biomedical engineers succeed in realising improved durability and/or infection resistance of TEHV.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14396637, 14393972, and 16187598
Volume :
21
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European Journal of Health Economics
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b392d0eaeadba52ff57b135c8cf88262