Back to Search Start Over

The Santiago-Harvard-Edinburgh-Durham void comparison II: unveiling the Vainshtein screening using weak lensing

Authors :
Sownak Bose
Marius Cautun
Joaquin Armijo
Yan-Chuan Cai
Baojiu Li
E. Paillas
Nelson Padilla
Source :
Paillas, E, Cautun, M, Li, B, Cai, Y-C, Padilla, N, Armijo, J & Bose, S 2019, ' The Santiago-Harvard-Edinburgh-Durham void comparison II: unveiling the Vainshtein screening using weak lensing ', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 484, no. 1, pp. 1149-1165 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2019 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

We study cosmic voids in the normal-branch Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (nDGP) braneworld models, which are representative of a class of modified gravity theories where deviations from General Relativity are usually hidden by the Vainshtein screening in high-density environments. This screening is less efficient away from these environments, which makes voids ideally suited for testing this class of models. We use N-body simulations of $\Lambda$-cold dark matter ($\Lambda$CDM) and nGDP universes, where dark matter haloes are populated with mock galaxies that mimic the clustering and number densities of the BOSS CMASS galaxy sample. We measure the force, density and weak lensing profiles around voids identified with six different algorithms. Compared to $\Lambda$CDM, voids in nDGP are more under-dense due to the action of the fifth force that arises in these models, which leads to a faster evacuation of matter from voids. This leaves an imprint on the weak lensing tangential shear profile around nDGP voids, an effect that is particularly strong for 2D underdensities that are identified in the plane-of-the-sky. We make predictions for the feasibility of distinguishing between nDGP and $\Lambda$CDM using void lensing in upcoming large-scale surveys such as LSST and Euclid. We compare with the analysis of voids in chameleon gravity theories and find that the weak lensing signal for 3D voids is similar to nDGP, whereas for 2D voids the differences with $\Lambda$CDM are much stronger for the chameleon gravity case, a direct consequence of the different screening mechanisms operating in these theories.<br />Comment: 17 pages, 12 figures; accepted version for publication in MNRAS

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Paillas, E, Cautun, M, Li, B, Cai, Y-C, Padilla, N, Armijo, J & Bose, S 2019, ' The Santiago-Harvard-Edinburgh-Durham void comparison II: unveiling the Vainshtein screening using weak lensing ', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 484, no. 1, pp. 1149-1165 . https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz022, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2019 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b28869c125ebc4db0ddfd9344be18be4
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz022