Back to Search Start Over

Health-related quality of life in the phase III ASCENT trial of sacituzumab govitecan versus standard chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Authors :
Sibylle Loibl
Delphine Loirat
Sara M. Tolaney
Kevin Punie
Mafalda Oliveira
Hope S. Rugo
Aditya Bardia
Sara A. Hurvitz
Adam M. Brufsky
Kevin Kalinsky
Javier Cortés
Joyce A. O'Shaughnessy
Véronique Dieras
Lisa A. Carey
Luca Gianni
Mahdi Gharaibeh
Luciana Preger
See Phan
Lawrence Chang
Ling Shi
Martine J. Piccart
Institut Català de la Salut
[Loibl S] Hämatologisch-Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Am Bethanien-Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany. [Loirat D] Medical Oncology Department and D3i, Institut Curie, Paris, France. [Tolaney SM] Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. [Punie K] Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. [Oliveira M] Servei d’Oncologia Mèdica, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Breast Cancer Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain. [Rugo HS] Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
Source :
Scientia
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Quality of life; Sacituzumab govitecan; Triple-negative breast neoplasms Qualitat de vida; Sacituzumab govitecan; Neoplàsies de mama triple negatiu Calidad de vida; Sacituzumab govitecan; Neoplasias de mama triple negativo Background The antibody–drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan (SG) prolongs progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with refractory/relapsed metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Here, we investigated its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods This analysis was based on the open-label phase III ASCENT trial (NCT02574455). Adults with refractory/relapsed mTNBC who had received ≥2 prior systemic therapies (≥1 in the metastatic setting) were randomised 1:1 to SG or treatment of physician's choice (TPC; capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine). HRQoL was assessed on day 1 of each treatment cycle using the EORTC QLQ-C30. Score changes from baseline were analysed using linear mixed-effect models for repeated measures. Stratified Cox regressions evaluated time to first clinically meaningful change of HRQoL. Results The analysis population comprised 236 patients randomised to SG and 183 to TPC. For global health status (GHS)/QoL, physical functioning, fatigue, and pain, changes from baseline were superior for SG versus TPC. Compared with TPC, SG was inferior regarding changes from baseline for nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea but non-inferior for other QLQ-C30 domains. Median time to first clinically meaningful worsening was longer for SG than for TPC for physical functioning (22.1 versus 12.1 weeks, P < 0.001), role functioning (11.4 versus 7.1 weeks, P < 0.001), fatigue (7.7 versus 6.0 weeks, P < 0.05), and pain (21.6 versus 9.9 weeks, P < 0.001). Conclusions SG was generally associated with greater improvements and delayed worsening of HRQoL scores compared with TPC. This supports the favourable profile of SG as an mTNBC treatment. This work was sponsored by Gilead Sciences.

Details

ISSN :
18790852
Volume :
178
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....b1d5f54a313c3f41b473e8f27fd0b5f3