Back to Search
Start Over
GABenchToB: a genome assembly benchmark tuned on bacteria and benchtop sequencers
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 9, p e107014 (2014), PLoS ONE
- Publication Year :
- 2014
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2014.
-
Abstract
- De novo genome assembly is the process of reconstructing a complete genomic sequence from countless small sequencing reads. Due to the complexity of this task, numerous genome assemblers have been developed to cope with different requirements and the different kinds of data provided by sequencers within the fast evolving field of next-generation sequencing technologies. In particular, the recently introduced generation of benchtop sequencers, like Illumina's MiSeq and Ion Torrent's Personal Genome Machine (PGM), popularized the easy, fast, and cheap sequencing of bacterial organisms to a broad range of academic and clinical institutions. With a strong pragmatic focus, here, we give a novel insight into the line of assembly evaluation surveys as we benchmark popular de novo genome assemblers based on bacterial data generated by benchtop sequencers. Therefore, single-library assemblies were generated, assembled, and compared to each other by metrics describing assembly contiguity and accuracy, and also by practice-oriented criteria as for instance computing time. In addition, we extensively analyzed the effect of the depth of coverage on the genome assemblies within reasonable ranges and the k-mer optimization problem of de Bruijn Graph assemblers. Our results show that, although both MiSeq and PGM allow for good genome assemblies, they require different approaches. They not only pair with different assembler types, but also affect assemblies differently regarding the depth of coverage where oversampling can become problematic. Assemblies vary greatly with respect to contiguity and accuracy but also by the requirement on the computing power. Consequently, no assembler can be rated best for all preconditions. Instead, the given kind of data, the demands on assembly quality, and the available computing infrastructure determines which assembler suits best. The data sets, scripts and all additional information needed to replicate our results are freely available at ftp://ftp.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de/pub/GABenchToB.
- Subjects :
- Epigenomics
Molecular biology
DNA cloning
Sequence assembly
lcsh:Medicine
Genome
De Bruijn graph
Genome Sequencing
lcsh:Science
Genetics
0303 health sciences
Multidisciplinary
030302 biochemistry & molecular biology
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Genomics
Benchmarking
Benchmark (computing)
symbols
Algorithms
Research Article
Personal genomics
Biology
Genome Complexity
Research and Analysis Methods
DNA sequencing
03 medical and health sciences
symbols.namesake
Sequencing Techniques
030304 developmental biology
Shotgun Sequencing
Sequence Assembly Tools
Biology and life sciences
Bacteria
High Throughput Sequencing
lcsh:R
Organisms
Correction
Computational Biology
Sequence Analysis, DNA
Ion semiconductor sequencing
Comparative Genomics
Genome Analysis
Molecular biology techniques
Computer architecture
Genes, Bacterial
lcsh:Q
Genome, Bacterial
Software
Cloning
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 9
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLoS ONE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b15a65446e2eef8d8beedb42803c06f5