Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Younger Versus Older Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression: Post-Hoc Analysis of SUSTAIN-2, a Long-Term Open-Label Phase 3 Safety and Efficacy Study
- Source :
- The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 30:541-556
- Publication Year :
- 2022
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2022.
-
Abstract
- Background Older, compared with younger, patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) typically have lower response and remission rates with poorer tolerability to antidepressant treatment. This post-hoc analysis compared outcomes following treatment with esketamine nasal spray (ESK) between younger (18-64 years) and older (≥65 years) patients with TRD. Methods SUSTAIN-2, an up to 1-year open-label safety and efficacy study of ESK plus an oral antidepressant, included patients with TRD either directly enrolled (≥18-year) or transferred from a phase 3 double-blind study, TRANSFORM-3 (≥65-year). Patients were treated in two phases: 4-week induction and 48-week optimization/maintenance. Results Younger (n = 624) and older (n = 178) patients had similar baseline characteristics except for hypertension history (21.5% versus 48.3%, respectively). Patients (younger versus older) had similar mean baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores and mean (SD) reductions in MADRS total scores for induction (-18.0 [7.19] versus -18.1 [9.37]; p = 0.492 [t = 0.69, df = 701]) and optimization/maintenance (week 12) (-19.9 [7.03] versus -22.2 [9.50]; p = 0.265 [t = -1.12, df = 3470]) phases. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) reported in younger versus older patients, respectively, were: induction, 86.1% versus 74.8%; optimization/maintenance, 86.8% versus 81.0%; serious TEAEs: induction, 2.2% versus 1.9%; optimization/maintenance, 6.7% versus 4.8%; TEAEs of increased blood pressure: induction, 6.9% versus 6.5%; optimization/maintenance, 7.1% versus 9.5%; and falls: induction, 0.3% versus 0.6%; optimization/maintenance, 0.2% versus 0.8%. Cognitive tests did not show clinically meaningful differences between the age groups. Conclusions Although limited by the open-label design of SUSTAIN-2, this post-hoc analysis showed generally comparable improvement in depression between ESK-treated younger and older adult patients with TRD, with consistent safety outcomes.
- Subjects :
- Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Adolescent
medicine.medical_treatment
Administration, Oral
Young Adult
Double-Blind Method
Internal medicine
Post-hoc analysis
medicine
Humans
Adverse effect
Depression (differential diagnoses)
Aged
Depression
business.industry
Nasal Sprays
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Antidepressive Agents
Psychiatry and Mental health
Esketamine
Treatment Outcome
Blood pressure
Tolerability
Nasal spray
Drug Therapy, Combination
Ketamine
Geriatrics and Gerontology
business
Treatment-resistant depression
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10647481
- Volume :
- 30
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b159f6d10ab5bee981f3073ed36804f0