Back to Search
Start Over
Diagnostic accuracy of EUS in differentiating mucosal versus submucosal invasion of superficial esophageal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Source :
- Gastrointestinal endoscopy. 75(2)
- Publication Year :
- 2010
-
Abstract
- Background The prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC) depends on the depth of tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis. EC limited to the mucosa (T1a) can be treated effectively with minimally invasive endoscopic therapy, whereas submucosal (T1b) EC carries relatively high risk of lymph node metastasis and requires surgical resection. Objective To determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS in differentiating T1a EC from T1b EC. Design We performed a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Cochrane, and CINAHL Plus databases to identify studies in which results of EUS-based staging of EC were compared with the results of histopathology of EMR or surgically resected esophageal lesions. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model was used to estimate the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio, and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was created. Setting Meta-analysis of 19 international studies. Patients Total of 1019 patients with superficial EC (SEC). Interventions EUS and EMR or surgical resection of SEC. Main Outcome Measurements Sensitivity and specificity of EUS in accurately staging SEC. Results The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratio of EUS for T1a staging were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90), 6.62 (95% CI, 3.61-12.12), and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.14-0.30), respectively. For T1b staging, these results were 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.89), 0.86 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), 5.13 (95% CI, 3.36-7.82), and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.09-0.30), respectively. The area under the curve was at least 0.93 for both mucosal and submucosal lesions. Limitations Heterogeneity was present among the studies. Conclusion Overall EUS has good accuracy (area under the curve ≥0.93) in staging SECs. Heterogeneity among the included studies suggests that multiple factors including the location and type of lesion, method and frequency of EUS probe, and the experience of the endosonographer can affect the diagnostic accuracy of EUS.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
Receiver operating characteristic
Esophageal Neoplasms
business.industry
Gastroenterology
Area under the curve
Esophageal cancer
Adenocarcinoma
medicine.disease
Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing
Sensitivity and Specificity
Confidence interval
Endosonography
Meta-analysis
Internal medicine
Diagnostic odds ratio
Medicine
Humans
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Histopathology
Neoplasm Invasiveness
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 10976779
- Volume :
- 75
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Gastrointestinal endoscopy
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....b03f07a28aa60fe8e5a02e14dc866d87