Back to Search
Start Over
What experimental approaches (eg, in vivo, in vitro, tissue retrieval) are effective in investigating the biologic effects of particles?
- Source :
- Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 16:S63-S67
- Publication Year :
- 2008
- Publisher :
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2008.
-
Abstract
- Understanding the complex cellular and tissue mechanisms and interactions resulting in periprosthetic osteolysis requires a number of experimental approaches, each of which has its own set of advantages and limitations. In vitro models allow for the isolation of individual cell populations and have furthered our understanding of particle-cell interactions; however, they are limited because they do not mimic the complex tissue environment in which multiple cell interactions occur. In vivo animal models investigate the tissue interactions associated with periprosthetic osteolysis, but the choice of species and whether the implant system is subjected to mechanical load or to unloaded conditions are critical in assessing whether these models can be extrapolated to the clinical condition. Rigid analysis of retrieved tissue from clinical cases of osteolysis offers a different approach to studying the biologic process of osteolysis, but it is limited in that the tissue analyzed represents the end-stage of this process and, thus, may not reflect this process adequately.
- Subjects :
- Osteolysis
business.industry
Joint Prosthesis
Biocompatible Materials
Computational biology
Periprosthetic osteolysis
medicine.disease
Article
In vitro
Prosthesis Failure
Disease Models, Animal
Research Design
In vivo
Animals
Humans
Medicine
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Surgery
Stress, Mechanical
Arthroplasty, Replacement
business
Process (anatomy)
Biomedical engineering
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1067151X
- Volume :
- 16
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....aff9c3ce003e3ea558e8ad67afe9793b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200800001-00013