Back to Search Start Over

How traditional and digital analytics interventions can enhance lung-protective ventilation strategies during general anaesthesia: A two-year quality improvement project analysis

Authors :
Cléa Gandon
Yann Gricourt
Maxime Thomas
Benjamin Garnaud
Mona Elhaj
Christophe Boisson
Thierry Boudemaghe
Samir Jaber
Pierre Géraud Claret
Philippe Cuvillon
Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau [Nîmes] (CHU Nîmes)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes (CHU Nîmes)
Université de Montpellier (UM)
Physiologie & médecine expérimentale du Cœur et des Muscles [U 1046] (PhyMedExp)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)
MORNET, Dominique
Source :
Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 2022, 41 (6), pp.101143. ⟨10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101143⟩
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2022.

Abstract

International audience; Purpose: This quality improvement project evaluated interventions implemented to enhance individual adherence to a lung-protective ventilation strategy and its triad: low tidal volume, PEEP ≥ 5, recruitment manoeuvres.Methods For two years, nine anaesthesia workstations were connected to an automated cloud-based analytics software tool, which automatically recorded ventilation parameters as soon as a new patient case was opened. Four quality improvement periods were determined over the first year: baseline, intervention, no intervention, intervention + digital. In the second year, the digital strategy was continued for nine months, followed by a final “overtime” period. Baseline and no intervention periods included no training. The intervention period included both conventional and educational programs. The digital period included pop-up messages, which automatically appeared on the screen of the anaesthesia data management system when patients were intubated. The primary endpoint was provider adherence to the recommended triad.Results: From October 2018 to December 2020, 12,883 procedures were performed. Data were available for 8968 procedures: baseline (n = 2361), intervention (n = 2423), no intervention (n = 1064), intervention + digital (n = 1862), overtime (n = 1258). Age, Predicted Body Weight, ASA score, type of surgery and airway management were similar between periods. At baseline, 75.2% of procedures reported low tidal volume but only 6.9% involved the complete triad. At over time, Triad was 22% (p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23525568
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine, 2022, 41 (6), pp.101143. ⟨10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101143⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....aff6084e7847808375116ac7a6ea3d56
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101143⟩