Changing the traditional p-value significance threshold to .005 does not decrease the number of statistically significant p-values in observational studies more than in randomised controlled trials

MLA

Mert Oztas, et al. “Changing the Traditional P-Value Significance Threshold to .005 Does Not Decrease the Number of Statistically Significant p-Values in Observational Studies More than in Randomised Controlled Trials.” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 39, no. 3, July 2020. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....af9dda3f02eb530998ab2840b3c0c830&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Mert Oztas, Zeynep Toker Dincer, Necdet Sut, & Hasan Yazici. (2020). Changing the traditional p-value significance threshold to .005 does not decrease the number of statistically significant p-values in observational studies more than in randomised controlled trials. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, 39(3).

Chicago

Mert Oztas, Zeynep Toker Dincer, Necdet Sut, and Hasan Yazici. 2020. “Changing the Traditional P-Value Significance Threshold to .005 Does Not Decrease the Number of Statistically Significant p-Values in Observational Studies More than in Randomised Controlled Trials.” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 39 (3). http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=edsair&AN=edsair.doi.dedup.....af9dda3f02eb530998ab2840b3c0c830&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.