Back to Search Start Over

Free multilobed posterior interosseous artery perforator flap for multi-finger skin defect reconstruction

Authors :
Kuangwen Li
Ming-jiang Liu
Jun Liu
Chang-Xiong Liu
Song-lin Xie
Source :
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 68:9-16
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2015.

Abstract

Summary Background The posterior interosseous artery (PIA) perforator flap can be used for reconstruction of soft-tissue defects of fingers. Based on the multiple perforators from the posterior interosseous artery, we describe a technique to reconstruct the multi-finger defect in the use of the free multilobed PIA perforator flap. Methods PIA perforators from different areas of the forearm were used to design a free multilobed skin paddle for multi-finger skin defect reconstruction. Each paddle without the deep fascia had separate perforators. To increase the perforator pedicle length, the courses of the PIA perforators were dissected from the superficial layer of the deep fascia to the subcutaneous layer. Results The flap was raised as a unilateral free bilobed PIA perforator flap in 10 cases of two-finger defects, a free trilobed PIA perforator flap in two cases of three-finger defects, and a bilateral free bilobed PIA perforator flap in one case of four-finger defects. The average effective vascular pedicle length and trunk pedicle length were 8.3 and 3.1 cm, respectively, for the bilobed flap, and 6.3 and 4.0 cm, respectively, for the trilobed flap. All flaps survived except one paddle with tip necrosis. At 10.8 months (range, 4–27 months) after surgery, 10 cases showed satisfactory cosmetic appearance, while the fingers were bulky in the remaining three cases. The average score of static two-point discrimination in 10 innervated paddles was 12.9 mm. The remaining 20 paddles recovered only protective sensation. The average total active motion (TAM) of each finger was 164° before surgery and 187° at the latest follow-up. Conclusions Free multilobed PIA perforator flap is a good candidate for reconstruction of multi-finger skin defect. Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, Ⅳ.

Details

ISSN :
17486815
Volume :
68
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....af1f7507b8196a66cb19856389de36b5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.08.063