Back to Search Start Over

Assessing the Effect of Weight-Based Protocol Modifications to Lower Dose for CT-Guided Hepatic and Renal Tumor Radiofrequency Ablations

Authors :
Ronald S. Arellano
Debra A. Gervais
Supriya Gupta
Dushyant V. Sahani
Source :
American Journal of Roentgenology. 210:657-662
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
American Roentgen Ray Society, 2018.

Abstract

This study assessed radiation dose after CT-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablations (RFAs) of hepatic and renal tumors and the effect of weight-based CT protocol modification for lowering overall dose in these procedures.CT-guided RFA for renal and hepatic ablations performed from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009, were retrospectively reviewed (90 men and 48 women; age, 42-81 years). The radiation dose was recorded during each of the following steps: planning, performing, and postprocedure. Weight-based protocol modification changes in tube voltage and tube current were then applied to renal and hepatic ablations performed subsequently (18 men and 11 women; age, 48-82 years). Image quality, needle localization, lesion detection, ability to detect complications, and overall operator satisfaction were noted for each case (score, 1-5). Dose reduction after modification was then calculated.Retrospective analysis found a mean (± SD) overall CT dose index (CTDI) for CT-guided RFA to be 16.5 ± 2.3 mGy. After protocol modification, the mean CTDI decreased to 6.63 ± 0.67 mGy, a 59.6% reduction overall; for hepatic ablations, the reduction was 65.96% (p0.0001) and the reduction for renal ablations was 38.97% (p = 0.0153). Image quality analysis showed high operator satisfaction (3-5), including adequate needle localization (4-5), lesion visibility (3-5), and high performer confidence (4-5). Higher dose reduction was noted for patients weighing more than 180 lb (82 kg) (p0.0001).Simple weight-based CT protocol modifications can significantly reduce radiation dose during CT-guided percutaneous ablations in the liver and kidneys without significantly sacrificing image quality.

Details

ISSN :
15463141 and 0361803X
Volume :
210
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
American Journal of Roentgenology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....aeb3b09da1e7ca768a23bc1ccb32e2d1