Back to Search Start Over

Remote timed up and go evaluation from activities of daily living reveals changing mobility after surgery

Authors :
Kim Delbaere
Sietse M. Rispens
Martin Stevens
Harmke Nijboer
Jildou Hoogland
Gabriele Spina
Matthew A. Brodie
Janneke Annegarn
Salvatore Saporito
Public Health Research (PHR)
Source :
Physiological Measurement, 40(3):035004. IOP PUBLISHING LTD
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

BACKGROUND Mobility impairment is common in older adults and negatively influences the quality of life. Mobility level may change rapidly following surgery or hospitalization in the elderly. The timed up and go (TUG) is a simple, frequently used clinical test for functional mobility; however, TUG requires supervision from a trained clinician, resulting in infrequent assessments. Additionally, assessment by TUG in clinic settings may not be completely representative of the individual's mobility in their home environment. OBJECTIVE In this paper, we introduce a method to estimate TUG from activities detected in free-living, enabling continuous remote mobility monitoring without expert supervision. The method is used to monitor changes in mobility following total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS Community-living elderly (n = 239, 65-91 years) performed a standardized TUG in a laboratory and wore a wearable pendant device that recorded accelerometer and barometric sensor data for at least three days. Activities of daily living (ADLs), including walks and sit-to-stand transitions, and their related mobility features were extracted and used to develop a regularized linear model for remote TUG test estimation. Changes in the remote TUG were evaluated in orthopaedic patients (n = 15, 55-75 years), during 12-weeks period following THA. MAIN RESULTS In leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV), a strong correlation (ρ = 0.70) was observed between the new remote TUG and standardized TUG times. Test-retest reliability of 3-days estimates was high (ICC = 0.94). Compared to week 2 post-THA, remote TUG was significantly improved at week 6 (11.7 ± 3.9 s versus 8.0 ± 1.8 s, p

Details

ISSN :
13616579 and 09673334
Volume :
40
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Physiological measurement
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ae6c07b554ef2595a1cbdc1e48e8b0b3