Back to Search Start Over

Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data:simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes

Authors :
Kari Furu
Øystein Karlstad
Morten Andersen
Jari Haukka
Sven Ove Samuelsen
Peter Vestergaard
Marie L. De Bruin
Frank de Vries
Vidar Hjellvik
Afd Pharmacoepi & Clinical Pharmacology
Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology
MUMC+: DA KFT Medische Staf (9)
Farmacologie en Toxicologie
RS: CAPHRI - R5 - Optimising Patient Care
Source :
Hjellvik, V, De Bruin, M L, Samuelsen, S O, Karlstad, Ø, Andersen, M, Haukka, J, Vestergaard, P, de Vries, F & Furu, K 2019, ' Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data : simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes ', Statistics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 2719-2734 . https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131, Statistics in Medicine, Hjellvik, V, De Bruin, M L, Samuelsen, S O, Karlstad, Ø, Andersen, M, Haukka, J, Vestergaard, P, de Vries, F & Furu, K 2019, ' Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data : Simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes ', Statistics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 2719-2734 . https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131, Statistics in Medicine, 38(15), 2719. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Statistics in Medicine, 38(15), 2719-2734. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

In epidemiology, one typically wants to estimate the risk of an outcome associated with an exposure after adjusting for confounders. Sometimes, outcome and exposure and maybe some confounders are available in a large data set, whereas some important confounders are only available in a validation data set that is typically a subset of the main data set. A generally applicable method in this situation is the two-stage calibration (TSC) method. We present a simplified easy-to-implement version of the TSC for the case where the validation data are a subset of the main data. We compared the simplified version to the standard TSC version for incidence rate ratios, odds ratios, relative risks, and hazard ratios using simulated data, and the simplified version performed better than our implementation of the standard version. The simplified version was also tested on real data and performed well.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
02776715
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Hjellvik, V, De Bruin, M L, Samuelsen, S O, Karlstad, Ø, Andersen, M, Haukka, J, Vestergaard, P, de Vries, F & Furu, K 2019, ' Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data : simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes ', Statistics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 2719-2734 . https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131, Statistics in Medicine, Hjellvik, V, De Bruin, M L, Samuelsen, S O, Karlstad, Ø, Andersen, M, Haukka, J, Vestergaard, P, de Vries, F & Furu, K 2019, ' Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data : Simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes ', Statistics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 2719-2734 . https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131, Statistics in Medicine, 38(15), 2719. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Statistics in Medicine, 38(15), 2719-2734. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....add6a330383783c22e378747e53d494b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131