Back to Search
Start Over
Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data:simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes
- Source :
- Hjellvik, V, De Bruin, M L, Samuelsen, S O, Karlstad, Ø, Andersen, M, Haukka, J, Vestergaard, P, de Vries, F & Furu, K 2019, ' Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data : simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes ', Statistics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 2719-2734 . https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131, Statistics in Medicine, Hjellvik, V, De Bruin, M L, Samuelsen, S O, Karlstad, Ø, Andersen, M, Haukka, J, Vestergaard, P, de Vries, F & Furu, K 2019, ' Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data : Simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes ', Statistics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 2719-2734 . https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131, Statistics in Medicine, 38(15), 2719. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Statistics in Medicine, 38(15), 2719-2734. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- In epidemiology, one typically wants to estimate the risk of an outcome associated with an exposure after adjusting for confounders. Sometimes, outcome and exposure and maybe some confounders are available in a large data set, whereas some important confounders are only available in a validation data set that is typically a subset of the main data set. A generally applicable method in this situation is the two-stage calibration (TSC) method. We present a simplified easy-to-implement version of the TSC for the case where the validation data are a subset of the main data. We compared the simplified version to the standard TSC version for incidence rate ratios, odds ratios, relative risks, and hazard ratios using simulated data, and the simplified version performed better than our implementation of the standard version. The simplified version was also tested on real data and performed well.
- Subjects :
- Statistics and Probability
Calibration (statistics)
Computer science
two-stage calibration
validation data
ADJUSTMENT
Risk Assessment
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Statistics
Taverne
Humans
Computer Simulation
030212 general & internal medicine
030304 developmental biology
Probability
Proportional Hazards Models
0303 health sciences
Confounding
Hazard ratio
Reproducibility of Results
Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
Odds ratio
CANCER
bias correction
unmeasured confounding
Survival Analysis
Outcome (probability)
Data set
Relative risk
Calibration
epidemiology
Stage (hydrology)
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 02776715
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Hjellvik, V, De Bruin, M L, Samuelsen, S O, Karlstad, Ø, Andersen, M, Haukka, J, Vestergaard, P, de Vries, F & Furu, K 2019, ' Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data : simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes ', Statistics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 2719-2734 . https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131, Statistics in Medicine, Hjellvik, V, De Bruin, M L, Samuelsen, S O, Karlstad, Ø, Andersen, M, Haukka, J, Vestergaard, P, de Vries, F & Furu, K 2019, ' Adjusting for unmeasured confounding using validation data : Simplified two-stage calibration for survival and dichotomous outcomes ', Statistics in Medicine, vol. 38, no. 15, pp. 2719-2734 . https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131, Statistics in Medicine, 38(15), 2719. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Statistics in Medicine, 38(15), 2719-2734. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....add6a330383783c22e378747e53d494b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8131