Back to Search Start Over

Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan

Authors :
Makoto Kurano
Chungen Qian
Yoshifumi Morita
Yuki Nakano
Fan He
Hitoshi Okazaki
Fuzhen Xia
Takuya Shimura
Yoshiro Kishi
Yasuyuki Seto
Jun Okada
Yutaka Nagura
Tatsuhiko Kodama
Rin Yokoyama
Yutaka Yatomi
Kyoji Moriya
Naoyuki Yoshikawa
Source :
PLoS ONE, PLOS ONE, 16(3):e0247711, PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 3, p e0247711 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2021.

Abstract

PCR methods are presently the standard for the diagnosis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but additional methodologies are needed to complement PCR methods, which have some limitations. Here, we validated and investigated the usefulness of measuring serum antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using the iFlash3000 CLIA analyzer. We measured IgM and IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 in sera collected from 26 PCR-positive COVID-19 patients, 53 COVID-19-suspected but PCR-negative patients, and 20 and 100 randomly selected non-COVID-19 patients who visited our hospital in 2020 and 2017, respectively. The repeatability and within-laboratory precision were obviously good in validations, following to the CLSI document EP15-A3. Linearity was also considered good between 0.6 AU/mL and 112.7 AU/mL for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and between 3.2 AU/mL and 55.3 AU/mL for SARS-CoV-2 IgG, while the linearity curves plateaued above the upper measurement range. We also confirmed that the seroconversion and no-antibody titers were over the cutoff values in all 100 serum samples collected in 2017. These results indicate that this measurement system successfully detects SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG. We observed four false-positive cases in the IgM assay and no false-positive cases in the IgG assay when 111 serum samples known to contain autoantibodies were evaluated. The concordance rates of the antibody test with the PCR test were 98.1% for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and 100% for IgG among PCR-negative cases and 30.8% for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and 73.1% for SARS-CoV-2 IgG among PCR-positive cases. In conclusion, the performance of this new automated method for detecting antibody against both N and S proteins of SARS-CoV-2 is sufficient for use in laboratory testing.

Details

ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
16
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLOS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ada54960dfedb4d3e0d0350673b2bb5d
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247711