Back to Search
Start Over
Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan
- Source :
- PLoS ONE, PLOS ONE, 16(3):e0247711, PLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 3, p e0247711 (2021)
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2021.
-
Abstract
- PCR methods are presently the standard for the diagnosis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but additional methodologies are needed to complement PCR methods, which have some limitations. Here, we validated and investigated the usefulness of measuring serum antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using the iFlash3000 CLIA analyzer. We measured IgM and IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 in sera collected from 26 PCR-positive COVID-19 patients, 53 COVID-19-suspected but PCR-negative patients, and 20 and 100 randomly selected non-COVID-19 patients who visited our hospital in 2020 and 2017, respectively. The repeatability and within-laboratory precision were obviously good in validations, following to the CLSI document EP15-A3. Linearity was also considered good between 0.6 AU/mL and 112.7 AU/mL for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and between 3.2 AU/mL and 55.3 AU/mL for SARS-CoV-2 IgG, while the linearity curves plateaued above the upper measurement range. We also confirmed that the seroconversion and no-antibody titers were over the cutoff values in all 100 serum samples collected in 2017. These results indicate that this measurement system successfully detects SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG. We observed four false-positive cases in the IgM assay and no false-positive cases in the IgG assay when 111 serum samples known to contain autoantibodies were evaluated. The concordance rates of the antibody test with the PCR test were 98.1% for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and 100% for IgG among PCR-negative cases and 30.8% for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and 73.1% for SARS-CoV-2 IgG among PCR-positive cases. In conclusion, the performance of this new automated method for detecting antibody against both N and S proteins of SARS-CoV-2 is sufficient for use in laboratory testing.
- Subjects :
- RNA viruses
Viral Diseases
Pulmonology
Coronaviruses
Physiology
Artificial Gene Amplification and Extension
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
Antibodies, Viral
Biochemistry
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Serology
law.invention
Medical Conditions
0302 clinical medicine
Japan
law
Immune Physiology
Medicine
030212 general & internal medicine
Pathology and laboratory medicine
Polymerase chain reaction
Virus Testing
Immune System Proteins
Multidisciplinary
biology
Repeatability
Medical microbiology
Titer
Infectious Diseases
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
Viruses
SARS CoV 2
Pathogens
Antibody
Research Article
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
SARS coronavirus
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)
Science
Immunology
Research and Analysis Methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
Microbiology
Antibodies
COVID-19 Serological Testing
Respiratory Disorders
03 medical and health sciences
Diagnostic Medicine
Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins
Humans
Seroconversion
Molecular Biology Techniques
Molecular Biology
Autoantibodies
Chemiluminescence
Medicine and health sciences
Biology and life sciences
SARS-CoV-2
business.industry
Organisms
Viral pathogens
Autoantibody
COVID-19
Proteins
Covid 19
Serum samples
Respiratory infections
Virus testing
Serotology
Phosphoproteins
Microbial pathogens
Immunoglobulin M
Immunoglobulin G
Luminescent Measurements
Respiratory Infections
biology.protein
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 19326203
- Volume :
- 16
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- PLOS ONE
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ada54960dfedb4d3e0d0350673b2bb5d
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247711