Back to Search Start Over

Polymer-based or polymer-free stents in patients at high bleeding risk

Authors :
Seung Ho Hur
Kamaraj Selvaraj
Elvin Kedhi
Onyx One Investigators
Azfar Zaman
Matthew J. Price
Martin Hudec
Sanjeevan Pasupati
Steven O. Marx
Stephen G. Worthley
Sandeep Brar
Roxana Mehran
Raul Moreno
Minglei Liu
A Kahar Bin Abdul Ghapar
Azeem Latib
Eduardo Pinar
Darren Mylotte
Gregg W. Stone
Lisa Bousquette
Charles Tie
Hyo-Soo Kim
Adel Aminian
Ivana Jankovic
Daniel I. Simon
Petra Poliacikova
Adrian Wlodarczak
Stephan Windecker
Alexandre S Abizaid
Franco Fabbiocchi
David E. Kandzari
Ajay J. Kirtane
Ivo Petrov
Source :
Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, 2020.

Abstract

Background: polymer-free drug-coated stents provide superior clinical outcomes to bare-metal stents in patients at high bleeding risk who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and are treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy. Data on the use of polymer-based drug-eluting stents, as compared with polymer-free drug-coated stents, in such patients are limited. Methods: in an international, randomized, single-blind trial, we compared polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents with polymer-free umirolimus-coated stents in patients at high bleeding risk. After PCI, patients were treated with 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy, followed by single antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was a safety composite of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis at 1 year. The principal secondary outcome was target-lesion failure, an effectiveness composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization. Both outcomes were powered for noninferiority. Results: a total of 1996 patients at high bleeding risk were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive zotarolimus-eluting stents (1003 patients) or polymer-free drug-coated stents (993 patients). At 1 year, the primary outcome was observed in 169 of 988 patients (17.1%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 164 of 969 (16.9%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.1; P = 0.01 for noninferiority). The principal secondary outcome was observed in 174 patients (17.6%) in the zotarolimus-eluting stent group and in 169 (17.4%) in the polymer-free drug-coated stent group (risk difference, 0.2 percentage points; upper boundary of the one-sided 97.5% CI, 3.5; noninferiority margin, 4.4; P = 0.007 for noninferiority). Conclusions: among patients at high bleeding risk who received 1 month of dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI, use of polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to use of polymer-free drug-coated stents with regard to safety and effectiveness composite outcomes. (Funded by Medtronic; ONYX ONE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03344653.).

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Dipòsit Digital de la UB, Universidad de Barcelona
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ada4b3149ed0d331ec02dc2f97445a7d