Back to Search
Start Over
Changes in specimen preparation method may impact urine cytologic evaluation
- Source :
- American journal of clinical pathology. 130(3)
- Publication Year :
- 2008
-
Abstract
- This study was performed to identify differences in the frequency of specific cytologic diagnoses obtained between specimens prepared by the filtration and ThinPrep (Cytyc, Marlborough, MA) techniques and to assess how these cytologic diagnoses correlated with pathologic findings. Data were collected from 2,347 voided urine specimens analyzed 8 months before and after ThinPrep implementation. Urine cytologic and bladder biopsy specimens were obtained as part of clinical follow-up, and positive diagnoses were considered evidence of malignancy. After ThinPrep implementation, the proportion of specimens diagnosed as negative significantly decreased (85.5% vs 78.6%; P < .001), clusters (5.8% vs 5.6%; P = .597) and positive (2.8% vs 3.3%; P = .143) diagnoses remained similar, and atypical (3.1% vs 8.4%; P < .001) and “suspicious” diagnoses (2.7% vs 4.1%; P < .001) increased. After 1 year of follow-up, there was no significant difference in the percentage of patients diagnosed with bladder carcinoma between the 2 methods for all cytologic categories.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Male
medicine.medical_specialty
Urine
Malignancy
Gastroenterology
Specimen Handling
Cytology
Internal medicine
Biopsy
medicine
Carcinoma
Humans
Urine cytology
Aged
Gynecology
Aged, 80 and over
Urinary bladder
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
General Medicine
Middle Aged
medicine.disease
Transitional cell carcinoma
medicine.anatomical_structure
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
Female
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00029173
- Volume :
- 130
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- American journal of clinical pathology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....ad229502f66de0907645b07b88d237b8