Back to Search Start Over

Implantable cardiac defibrillator leads dysfunction after LVAD implantation

Authors :
Gerard Babatasi
Nicolas D'Ostrevy
Pierre-Yves Litzler
Christophe Leclercq
Raphaël P. Martins
Matteo Pozzi
Philippe Gaudard
Edeline Pelcé
Vincent Galand
Eloi Marijon
Nicolas Lellouche
Thierry Bourguignon
Jean-Luc Pasquié
Marie Bielefeld
Aude Boignard
Bertrand Pierre
Marylou Para
André Vincentelli
Fabien Garnier
Frédéric Anselme
Stéphane Boulé
Philippe Maury
David Hamon
Pascal Defaye
Nicolas Welte
Hamed Bourenane
Emilie Varlet
Hugues Blangy
Vincent Probst
Michel Kindo
François Picard
Erwan Flecher
Thomas Cardi
Nicolas Sadoul
Katrien Blanchart
Jean-François Obadia
Vincent Algalarrondo
Jean-Baptiste Gourraud
Pierre Mondoly
Vlad Gariboldi
Romain Eschalier
Laboratoire Traitement du Signal et de l'Image (LTSI)
Université de Rennes 1 (UR1)
Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Lille] (CHRU Lille)
Service de cardiologie [Toulouse]
Hôpital de Rangueil
CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]-CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]
Université de Bordeaux (UB)
CHU Strasbourg
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)
Physiologie & médecine expérimentale du Cœur et des Muscles [U 1046] (PhyMedExp)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire [Grenoble] (CHU)
CIC - Grenoble
Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat - Claude Bernard [Paris]
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)
Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] (TIMONE)
Hôpital Louis Pradel [CHU - HCL]
Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)
Service de cardiologie [CHU Rouen]
CHU Rouen
Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN)
Normandie Université (NU)
CHU Caen
Normandie Université (NU)-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon)
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU TOURS)
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou [APHP] (HEGP)
Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)
Service de Cardiologie [CHRU Nancy]
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)
NA, Fédération Française de Cardiologie
Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN)
Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-CHU Rouen
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours (CHRU Tours)
Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)
Service Cardiologie [CHU Toulouse]
Pôle Cardiovasculaire et Métabolique [CHU Toulouse]
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse)
Source :
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Wiley, 2020, 43 (11), pp.1309-1317. ⟨10.1111/pace.14004⟩, PACE-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, PACE-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2020, 43 (11), pp.1309-1317. ⟨10.1111/pace.14004⟩
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2020.

Abstract

Background Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead dysfunction has been reported after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in limited single-center studies. We aimed at describing and characterizing the incidence of ICD lead parameters dysfunction after LVAD implantation. Methods Among the 652 patients enrolled in the ASSIST-ICD study, only patients with an ICD prior to LVAD were included (n = 401). ICD lead parameters dysfunction following LVAD implantation is defined as follows: (a) >50% decrease in sensing threshold, (b) pacing lead impedance increase/decrease by >100Ω, and (c) >50% increase in pacing threshold. Results One hundred twenty-two patients with an ICD prior to LVAD had available ICD interrogation reports prior and after LVAD. A total of 67 (55%) patients exhibited at least one significant lead dysfunction: 17 (15%) exhibited >50% decrease in right ventricular (RV) sensing, 51 (42%) had >100 Ω increase/decrease in RV pacing impedance, and 24 (20%) experienced >50% increase in RV pacing threshold. A total of 52 patients experienced ventricular arrhythmia during follow-up and all were successfully detected and treated by the device. All lead dysfunction could be managed conservatively. Conclusion More than 50% of LVAD-recipients may experience >1 significant change in lead parameters but none had severe clinical consequences.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01478389 and 15408159
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Wiley, 2020, 43 (11), pp.1309-1317. ⟨10.1111/pace.14004⟩, PACE-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, PACE-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2020, 43 (11), pp.1309-1317. ⟨10.1111/pace.14004⟩
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ac99f1d5753d4b220bcf9c45bb888b2b
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14004⟩