Back to Search Start Over

Probability mapping of soil thickness by random survival forest at a national scale

Authors :
Nicolas Saby
Vera Leatitia Mulder
Christian Walter
Songchao Chen
Manuel Martin
Anne C. Richer-de-Forges
Bifeng Hu
Thomas Loiseau
Dominique Arrouays
Marine Lacoste
Unité INFOSOL (ORLEANS INFOSOL)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Wageningen University and Research Center (WUR)
Unité INFOSOL
AGROCAMPUS OUEST
Sol Agro et hydrosystème Spatialisation (SAS)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST
Unité de recherche Science du Sol (USS)
Institute of Agricultural Remote Sensing and Information Technology Application
Zhejiang University
InfoSol (InfoSol)
Wageningen University and Research [Wageningen] (WUR)
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)
Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)
Source :
Geoderma, 344, 184-194, Geoderma, Geoderma, Elsevier, 2019, 344, pp.184-194. ⟨10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.016⟩, Geoderma 344 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

ISI Document Delivery No.: HT3RS Times Cited: 0 Cited Reference Count: 79 Chen, Songchao Mulder, Vera Leatitia Martin, Manuel P. Walter, Christian Lacost, Marine Richer-de-Forges, Anne C. Saby, Nicolas P. A. Loiseau, Thomas Hu, Bifeng Arrouays, Dominique French Ministry of Ecology; French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME); French Institute for Research and Development (IRD); French Institute for National Geographic and Forest Information (IGN); National Institute for Agronomic Research (INRA); China Scholarship Council [201606320211]; French Scientific Group of Interest on soils (GIS Sol) The collection and handling of soil data was supported by the French Scientific Group of Interest on soils (GIS Sol), including the French Ministry of Ecology, the French Ministry of Agriculture, the French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME), the French Institute for Research and Development (IRD), the French Institute for National Geographic and Forest Information (IGN) and the National Institute for Agronomic Research (INRA). We thank all the people involved in sampling the sites and populating the database. We would also like to thank Quentin Styc and Philippe Lagacherie for sharing their ideas on dealing with right censored data. Songchao Chen received the support of the China Scholarship Council for three years' of Ph.D. study in INRA and Agrocampus Ouest (under grant agreement no. 201606320211). 0 Elsevier science bv Amsterdam 1872-6259; International audience; Soil thickness (ST) is a crucial factor in earth surface modelling and soil storage capacity calculations (e.g., available water capacity and carbon stocks). However, the observed depths recorded in soil information systems for some profiles are often less than the actual ST (i.e., right censored data). The use of such data will negatively affect model and map accuracy, yet few studies have been done to resolve this issue or propose methods to correct for right censored data. Therefore, this work demonstrates how right censored data can be accounted for in the ST modelling of mainland France. We propose the use of Random Survival Forest (RSF) for ST probability mapping within a Digital Soil Mapping framework. Among 2109 sites of the French Soil Monitoring Network, 1089 observed STs were defined as being right censored. Using RSF, the probability of exceeding a given depth was modelled using freely available spatial data representing the main soil-forming factors. Subsequently, the models were extrapolated to the full spatial extent of mainland France. As examples, we produced maps showing the probability of exceeding the thickness of each GlobalSoilMap standard depth: 5, 15, 30, 60, 100, and 200 cm. In addition, a bootstrapping approach was used to assess the 90% confidence intervals. Our results showed that RSF was able to correct for right censored data entries occurring within a given dataset. RSF was more reliable for thin (0.3 m) and thick soils (1 to 2 m), as they performed better (overall accuracy from 0.793 to 0.989) than soils with a thickness between 0.3 and 1 m. This study provides a new approach for modelling right censored soil information. Moreover, RSF can produce probability maps at any depth less than the maximum depth of the calibration data, which is of great value for designing additional sampling campaigns and decision making in geotechnical engineering.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00167061 and 18726259
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Geoderma, 344, 184-194, Geoderma, Geoderma, Elsevier, 2019, 344, pp.184-194. ⟨10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.016⟩, Geoderma 344 (2019)
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ac6f8fd04154844c6e6c83ed0444c602