Back to Search Start Over

Artemether-lumefantrine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for treating uncomplicated malaria: a randomized trial to guide policy in Uganda

Authors :
Fred Wabwire-Mangen
Ambrose Talisuna
Moses R. Kamya
Philip J. Rosenthal
Hasifa Bukirwa
Myers Lugemwa
Grant Dorsey
Adoke Yeka
Sarah G. Staedke
John B. Rwakimari
Sutherland, Colin J
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 3, Iss 6, p e2390 (2008), PLoS ONE, PloS one, vol 3, iss 6
Publication Year :
2008
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2008.

Abstract

Author(s): Yeka, Adoke; Dorsey, Grant; Kamya, Moses R; Talisuna, Ambrose; Lugemwa, Myers; Rwakimari, John Bosco; Staedke, Sarah G; Rosenthal, Philip J; Wabwire-Mangen, Fred; Bukirwa, Hasifa | Abstract: BackgroundUganda recently adopted artemether-lumefantrine (AL) as the recommended first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria. However, AL has several limitations, including a twice-daily dosing regimen, recommendation for administration with fatty food, and a high risk of reinfection soon after therapy in high transmission areas. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) is a new alternative artemisinin-based combination therapy that is dosed once daily and has a long post-treatment prophylactic effect. We compared the efficacy and safety of AL with DP in Kanungu, an area of moderate malaria transmission.Methodology/principal findingsPatients aged 6 months to 10 years with uncomplicated falciparum malaria were randomized to therapy and followed for 42 days. Genotyping was used to distinguish recrudescence from new infection. Of 414 patients enrolled, 408 completed follow-up. Compared to patients treated with artemether-lumefantrine, patients treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine had a significantly lower risk of recurrent parasitaemia (33.2% vs. 12.2%; risk difference = 20.9%, 95% CI 13.0-28.8%) but no statistically significant difference in the risk of treatment failure due to recrudescence (5.8% vs. 2.0%; risk difference = 3.8%, 95% CI -0.2-7.8%). Patients treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine also had a lower risk of developing gametocytaemia after therapy (4.2% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.01). Both drugs were safe and well tolerated.Conclusions/significanceDP is highly efficacious, and operationally preferable to AL because of a less intensive dosing schedule and requirements. Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine should be considered for a role in the antimalarial treatment policy of Uganda.Trial registrationControlled-Trials.com ISRCTN75606663.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
3
Issue :
6
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....abb03cbaa4ba97a27fab7dd41af1f46b