Back to Search Start Over

Kidney Transplant List Status and Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA-CKD Trial

Authors :
Rebecca Anthopolos
Yifan Xu
David J. Maron
Judith S. Hochman
Rafael A. Maldonado
Charles A. Herzog
Jerome L. Fleg
Gregg W. Stone
Sripal Bangalore
Sanjeev Gulati
Mandeep S. Sidhu
Magdelena Madero
Mengistu Simegn
Mohammad El-Hajjar
Eric Daugas
Salvatore P. Costa
Roy O. Mathew
Source :
J Am Coll Cardiol
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary artery disease frequently undergo preemptive revascularization before kidney transplant listing. Objectives In this post hoc analysis from ISCHEMIA-CKD (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness of Medical and Invasive Approaches–Chronic Kidney Disease), we compared outcomes of patients not listed versus those listed according to management strategy. Methods In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial (n = 777), 194 patients (25%) with chronic coronary syndromes and at least moderate ischemia were listed for transplant. The primary (all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction) and secondary (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or stroke) outcomes were analyzed using Cox multivariable modeling. Heterogeneity of randomized treatment effect between listed versus not listed groups was assessed. Results Compared with those not listed, listed patients were younger (60 years vs 65 years), were less likely to be of Asian race (15% vs 29%), were more likely to be on dialysis (83% vs 44%), had fewer anginal symptoms, and were more likely to have coronary angiography and coronary revascularization irrespective of treatment assignment. Among patients assigned to an invasive strategy versus conservative strategy, the adjusted hazard ratios for the primary outcome were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–1.54) and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.78–1.37) for those listed and not listed, respectively (pinteraction= 0.68). Adjusted hazard ratios for secondary outcomes were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.55–1.46) in listed and 1.17 (95% CI: 0.89–1.53) in those not listed (pinteraction = 0.35). Conclusions In ISCHEMIA-CKD, an invasive strategy in kidney transplant candidates did not improve outcomes compared with conservative management. These data do not support routine coronary angiography or revascularization in patients with advanced CKD and chronic coronary syndromes listed for transplant. (ISCHEMIA-Chronic Kidney Disease Trial [ISCHEMIA-CKD]; NCT01985360 )

Details

ISSN :
15583597
Volume :
78
Issue :
4
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....ab11d06ad1aed5d4cb8e4de3997b79df