Back to Search Start Over

Reproducibility of Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Authors :
James G. Fujimoto
Jeffery G. Coker
Joel S. Schuman
Carmen A. Puliafito
Michael R. Hee
J. R. Wilkins
Eric A. Swanson
Ellen Hertzmark
Tamar Pedut-Kloizman
Source :
Ophthalmology. 103:1889-1898
Publication Year :
1996
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 1996.

Abstract

Purpose: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a new technology that uses near-infrared light in an interferometer to produce approximately 10-µm resolution crosssectional images of the tissue of interest. The authors performed repeated quantitative assessment of nerve fiber layer thickness in individuals with normal and glaucomatous eyes, and they evaluated the reproducibility of these measurements. Methods: The authors studied 21 eyes of 21 subjects by OCT. Each subject underwent five repetitions of a series of scans on five separate occasions within a 1-month period. Each series consisted of three circular scans around the optic nerve head (diameters, 2.9, 3.4, and 4.5 mm). Each series was performed separately using internal (fixation with same eye being studied) and external (fixation with contralateral eye) fixation techniques. The eye studied and the sequence of testing were assigned randomly. Results: Internal fixation (IF), in general, provides a slightly higher degree of reproducibility than external fixation (EF). Reproducibility was better in a given eye on a given visit than from visit to visit. Reproducibility as measured by intraclass correlation coefficients were as follows: circle diameter (CD), 2.9 mm, 0.51/0.57 (normal/glaucoma) (IF), 0.43/0.54 (EF); CD, 3.4 mm, 0.56/0.52 (IF), 0.43/0.61 (EF); CD, 4.5 mm, 0.53/0.43 (IF), 0.42/0.49 (EF). Conclusions: Nerve fiber layer thickness can be reproducibly measured using OCT. Internal is superior to external fixation; each circle diameter tested provides adequate reproducibility.

Details

ISSN :
01616420
Volume :
103
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Ophthalmology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....aac6463c56850f5f17fce1c23fbfe14c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30410-7