Back to Search Start Over

Individual patient data meta-analysis on continued use of glucocorticoids after their initiation as bridging therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Authors :
Lotte van Ouwerkerk
Maarten Boers
Paul Emery
Pascal HP de Jong
Robert BM Landewé
Willem Lems
Josef S Smolen
Patrick Verschueren
Tom WJ Huizinga
Cornelia F Allaart
Sytske Anne Bergstra
Rheumatology
Epidemiology and Data Science
AII - Inflammatory diseases
APH - Methodology
AMS - Musculoskeletal Health
AMS - Tissue Function & Regeneration
Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology
Source :
van Ouwerkerk, L, Boers, M, Emery, P, de Jong, P H, Landewé, R B, Lems, W, Smolen, J S, Verschueren, P, Huizinga, T W, Allaart, C F & Bergstra, S A 2022, ' Individual patient data meta-analysis on continued use of glucocorticoids after their initiation as bridging therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis ', Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases . https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2022-223443, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 82(4):223443, 468-475. BMJ Publishing Group, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. BMJ Publishing Group, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 82(4). BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, Annals of the rheumatic diseases. BMJ Publishing Group
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

ObjectivesTo investigate whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can discontinue glucocorticoids (GC) after GC ‘bridging’ in the initial treatment step and to identify factors that may affect this.MethodsData from 7 clinical trial arms (with 1653 patients) that included a GC bridging schedule, previously identified in a systematic literature search, were combined in an individual patient data meta-analysis. Outcomes were GC use (yes/no) at predefined time points (1/3/6/12/18 months after bridging had ended), cumulative GC dose and continuous (≥3 months) GC use after bridging had ended. Age, sex, ACPA status, initial GC dose, duration of bridging schedule, oral versus parenteral GC administration and initial co-treatment were univariably tested with each outcome.ResultsThe probability of using GC 1 month after bridging therapy had ended was 0.18, decreasing to 0.07 from 6 until 18 months after bridging had ended. The probability of continuous GC use after bridging had ended was 0.18 at 1 year and 0.30 at 2 years of follow-up. In oral GC bridging studies only, the probabilities of later and continuous GC use and the cumulative GC doses were higher compared to the combined analyses with also parenteral GC bridging studies included. A higher initial dose and a longer GC bridging schedule were associated with higher cumulative GC doses and more patients on GC at 18 months after bridging had ended.ConclusionsBased on these RA clinical trial arms with an initial GC bridging schedule, the probability of subsequent ongoing GC use following bridging is low.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034967
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of the rheumatic diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....aabae0b18029d75a57736155b8616d62