Back to Search Start Over

International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1

Authors :
Andrea Fossati
Włodzimierz Strus
Jens C. Thimm
Bo Bach
André Kerber
Aidan G. C. Wright
Lucas Spanemberg
Jean Pierre Rolland
Laurence Claes
Tim Bastiaens
Johannes Zimmermann
Fernando Gutiérrez
Antonella Somma
Anton Aluja
Karel D. Riegel
Jared W. Keeley
Martin Sellbom
Rute Pires
Sérgio Eduardo Silva de Oliveira
Isabelle Roskam
Bach, B.
Kerber, A.
Aluja, A.
Bastiaens, T.
Keeley, J. W.
Claes, L.
Fossati, A.
Gutierrez, F.
Oliveira, S. E. S.
Pires, R.
Riegel, K. D.
Rolland, J. -P.
Roskam, I.
Sellbom, M.
Somma, A.
Spanemberg, L.
Strus, Wl.
Thimm, J. C.
Wright, A. G. C.
Zimmermann, J.
Source :
Repositorio Abierto de la UdL, Universitad de Lleida, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname, Recercat: Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya), Psychopathology
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Karger Publishers, 2020.

Abstract

Introduction: The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders (PD) are largely commensurate and, when combined, they delineate 6 trait domains: negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism. Objective: The present study evaluated the international validity of a brief 36-item patient-report measure that portrays all 6 domains simultaneously including 18 primary subfacets. Methods: We developed and employed a modified version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 – Brief Form Plus (PID5BF+). A total of 16,327 individuals were included, 2,347 of whom were patients. The expected 6-factor structure of facets was initially investigated in samples from Denmark (n = 584), Germany (n = 1,271), and the USA (n = 605) and subsequently replicated in both patient- and community samples from Italy, France, Switzerland, Belgium, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Poland, Czech Republic, the USA, and Brazil. Associations with interview-rated DSM-5 PD categories were also investigated. Results: Findings generally supported the empirical soundness and international robustness of the 6 domains including meaningful associations with familiar interview-rated PD types. Conclusions: The modified PID5BF+ may be employed internationally by clinicians and researchers for brief and reliable assessment of the 6 combined DSM-5 and ICD-11 domains, including 18 primary subfacets. This 6-domain framework may inform a future nosology for DSM-5.1 that is more reasonably aligned with the authoritative ICD-11 codes than the current DSM-5 AMPD model. The 36-item modified PID5BF+ scoring key is provided in online supplementary Appendix A see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000507589 (for all online suppl. material).

Details

ISSN :
02544962
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Repositorio Abierto de la UdL, Universitad de Lleida, Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, instname, Recercat: Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya, Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya), Psychopathology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....aa8ee9ac4ebacfdf8bfbb9307fc72e79