Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a 26 Al Microtracer Approach

Authors :
Dimitri Grossouw
Wouter H. J. Vaes
Pierre A.M. Peeters
Sieto Bosgra
Albert D. Windhorst
Gerrit A. van der Luijt
Jacobus Burggraaf
Camilla Alexander-White
Rianne de Ligt
Esther van Duijn
Radiology and nuclear medicine
Amsterdam Neuroscience - Brain Imaging
Source :
Clinical and Translational Science, Cts-clinical and translational science, 11(6), 573-581. Wiley-Blackwell, de Ligt, R, van Duijn, E, Grossouw, D, Bosgra, S, Burggraaf, J, Windhorst, A, Peeters, P A M, van der Luijt, G A, Alexander-White, C & Vaes, W H J 2018, ' Assessment of Dermal Absorption of Aluminum from a Representative Antiperspirant Formulation Using a 26Al Microtracer Approach ', Cts-clinical and translational science, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 573-581 . https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12579
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Wiley, 2018.

Abstract

A clinical pharmacokinetic study was performed in 12 healthy women to evaluate systemic exposure to aluminum following topical application of a representative antiperspirant formulation under real-life use conditions. A simple roll-on formulation containing an extremely rare isotope of aluminum (26 Al) chlorohydrate (ACH) was prepared to commercial specifications. A 26 Al radio-microtracer was used to distinguish dosed aluminum from natural background, using accelerated mass spectroscopy. The 26 Al citrate was administered intravenously (i.v.) to estimate fraction absorbed (Fabs ) following topical delivery. In blood samples after i.v. administration, 26 Al was readily detected (mean area under the curve (AUC) = 1,273 ± 466 hours×fg/mL). Conversely, all blood samples following topical application were below the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ; 0.12 fg/mL), except two samples (0.13 and 0.14 fg/mL); a maximal AUC was based on LLOQs. The aluminum was above the LLOQ (61 ag/mL) in 31% of urine samples. From the urinary excretion data, a conservative estimated range for dermal Fabs of 0.002-0.06% was calculated, with a mean estimate of 0.0094%.

Details

ISSN :
17528054
Volume :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical and Translational Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a9735eef5585f4a9b2760226ccdd52dc