Back to Search
Start Over
Contrasting interactions of pipradrol, d-amphetamine, cocaine, cocaine analogues, apomorphine and other drugs with conditioned reinforcement
- Source :
- Psychopharmacology. 80:113-119
- Publication Year :
- 1983
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 1983.
-
Abstract
- The effects of various psychomotor stimulant drugs and drugs outside this class were examined on the efficacy of stimuli previously paired with reinforcement or reward (conditioned reinforcers, CR) in controlling responding. Pipradrol (5-45 mumol/kg), d-amphetamine (1.25-15.0 mumol/kg), and the cocaine analogues WIN 35,428 (0.1-30.0 mumol/kg) and in one of two determinations WIN 35,065-2 (0.1-29.0 mumol/kg) all generally increased responding on a lever providing CR, but did not change or decreased responding on a lever providing no CR (NCR). Cocaine (5-125 mumol/kg) and chlordiazepoxide (3.75-60.0 mumol/kg) had no significant effects. Morphine (3.2-32.0 mumol/kg) and alpha-flupenthixol (0.02-2.0 mumol/kg) generally reduced responding on both levers. Apomorphine (0.1-1.0 mumol/kg) generally increased responding on both levers. Neurochemical data showed that d-amphetamine was generally more potent than pipradrol in its effects on in vitro monoamine uptake and release.
- Subjects :
- Male
Dextroamphetamine
Apomorphine
medicine.medical_treatment
Pharmacology
Chlordiazepoxide
Cocaine
Piperidines
Dopamine
medicine
Animals
Pipradrol
Morphine
Rats
Flupenthixol
Stimulant
Monoamine neurotransmitter
Conditioning, Operant
Central Nervous System Stimulants
Psychology
Reinforcement, Psychology
medicine.drug
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14322072 and 00333158
- Volume :
- 80
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Psychopharmacology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a8ea10d183c8a2ae34a0e0ba0c9b3a75
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00427952