Back to Search Start Over

HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

Authors :
Daniel P. Judge
Ramon Brugada
Robert Hamilton
Douglas P. Zipes
Arthur A.M. Wilde
Jeffrey A. Towbin
Hugh Calkins
Michael H. Gollob
William J. McKenna
Christian Wolpert
Patrick T. Ellinor
Eric Schulze-Bahr
Stephan Willems
A. John Camm
Charles I. Berul
Silvia G. Priori
Christopher Semsarian
Michael J. Ackerman
Ray E. Hershberger
Hugh Watkins
Hervé Le Marec
ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences
Cardiology
Source :
Heart rhythm, 8(8), 1308-1339. Elsevier, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology, 13(8), 1077-1109. Oxford University Press
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

This international consensus statement provides the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. It summarizes the opinion of the international writing group members based on their own experience and on a general review of the literature with respect to the use and role of genetic testing for these potentially heritable cardiac conditions. This document focuses primarily on the state of genetic testing for the 13 distinct entities detailed and the relative diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic impact of the genetic test result for each entity. It does not focus on the therapeutic management of the various channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. Treatment/management issues are only discussed for those diseases (i.e., LQTS, HCM, DCM + CCD, RCM) in which the genetic test result could potentially influence treatment considerations. Writing recommendations for genetic diseases require adaptation of the methodology normally adopted to prepare guidelines for clinical practice. Documents produced by other scientific societies have acknowledged the need to define the criteria used to rank the strength of recommendation for genetic diseases.1 The most obvious difference is that randomized and/or blinded studies do not exist. Instead, most of the available data are derived from registries that have followed patients and recorded outcome information. The authors of this statement have therefore defined specific criteria for Class I, Class IIa or b, and Class III recommendations and have used the conventional language adopted by AHA/ACC/ESC Guidelines to express each class. All recommendations are level of evidence (LOE) C (i.e., based on experts' opinions). A Class I recommendation ( “is recommended” ) was applied for genetic testing in index cases with a sound clinical suspicion for the presence of a channelopathy or a cardiomyopathy when the positive predictive value of a genetic test is high (likelihood of positive result >40% and signal/noise ratio >10; Table 3), AND/OR when …

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15563871, 15475271, and 10995129
Volume :
8
Issue :
8
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Heart rhythm : the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a8d5f1ebe7014b82c8c15067983628d5