Back to Search Start Over

Chyle Leak Following Radical En Bloc Esophagectomy with Two-Field Nodal Dissection: Predisposing Factors, Management, and Outcomes

Authors :
Jakub Chmelo
S. Michael Griffin
Alexander W. Phillips
Anantha Madhavan
Sivesh K. Kamarajah
S Wahed
Pamela Milito
L. J. Dunn
Arul Immanuel
Source :
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Background Chyle leak is an uncommon complication following esophagectomy, accounting for significant morbidity and mortality; however, the optimal treatment for the chylothorax is still controversial. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence, management, and outcomes of chyle leaks within a specialist esophagogastric cancer center. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancers (adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma) between 1997 and 2017 at the Northern Oesophagogastric Unit were included from a contemporaneously maintained database. Primary outcome was overall survival, while secondary outcomes were overall complications, anastomotic leaks, and pulmonary complications. Results During the study period, 992 patients underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancers, and 5% (n = 50) of them developed chyle leaks. There was no significant difference in survival in patients who developed a chyle leak compared with those who did not (median: 40 vs. 45 months; p = 0.60). Patients developing chyle leaks had a significantly longer length of stay in critical care (median: 4 vs. 2 days; p = 0.002), but no difference in total length of hospital stay. Conclusion Chyle leak remains a complication following esophagectomy, with limited understanding on its pathophysiology in postoperative recovery. However, these data indicate chyle leak does not have a long-term impact on patients and does not affect long-term survival.

Details

ISSN :
15344681 and 10689265
Volume :
28
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a86c9817c394be4bf182e41a1e9960c8