Back to Search Start Over

Household income, fetal size and birth weight: an analysis of eight populations

Authors :
Steve Turner
Anke G Posthumus
Eric A P Steegers
Amel AlMakoshi
Bahauddin Sallout
Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman
Emily Oken
Ben Kumwenda
Fatemah Alostad
Catherine Wright-Corker
Laura Watson
Diane Mak
Hiu Ching Cheung
Alice Judge
Lorna Aucott
Vincent W V Jaddoe
Isabella Annesi Maesano
Munawar Hussain Soomro
Peter Hindmarsh
Geir Jacobsen
Torstein Vik
Isolina Riaño-Galan
Ana Cristina Rodríguez-Dehli
Aitana Lertxundi
Loreto Santa Marina Rodriguez
Martine Vrijheid
Jordi Julvez
Ana Esplugues
Carmen Iñiguez
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Erasmus MC other
Pediatrics
Source :
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 76(7), 629-636. BMJ Publishing Group, JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica, instname
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
BMJ, 2022.

Abstract

BackgroundThe age at onset of the association between poverty and poor health is not understood. Our hypothesis was that individuals from highest household income (HI), compared to those with lowest HI, will have increased fetal size in the second and third trimester and birth.Methods.Second and third trimester fetal ultrasound measurements and birth measurements were obtained from eight cohorts. Results were analysed in cross-sectional two-stage individual patient data (IPD) analyses and also a longitudinal one-stage IPD analysis.ResultsThe eight cohorts included 21 714 individuals. In the two-stage (cross-sectional) IPD analysis, individuals from the highest HI category compared with those from the lowest HI category had larger head size at birth (mean difference 0.22 z score (0.07, 0.36)), in the third trimester (0.25 (0.16, 0.33)) and second trimester (0.11 (0.02, 0.19)). Weight was higher at birth in the highest HI category. In the one-stage (longitudinal) IPD analysis which included data from six cohorts (n=11 062), head size was larger (mean difference 0.13 (0.03, 0.23)) for individuals in the highest HI compared with lowest category, and this difference became greater between the second trimester and birth. Similarly, in the one-stage IPD, weight was heavier in second highest HI category compared with the lowest (mean difference 0.10 (0 .00, 0.20)) and the difference widened as pregnancy progressed. Length was not linked to HI category in the longitudinal model.ConclusionsThe association between HI, an index of poverty, and fetal size is already present in the second trimester.

Details

ISSN :
14702738 and 0143005X
Volume :
76
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a811e0f62d8203c45c53e2db6d32a1df