Guidelines for cytogenetic investigations in tumours

Cytogenetic and molecular genetic data are of paramount importance in the diagnosis, prognosis, and risk stratification of patients with malignant diseases. Sometimes they even directly guide the choice of therapy.1 Disease-specific abnormalities, particularly translocations, can provide essential information to assist the Pathologist and/or Oncologist in assigning a diagnosis. In several diseases, tumour genetics correlate strongly with clinical risk; thus, cytogenetic information may help the Oncologist counsel the patient, choose a specific treatment, and/or modulate treatment intensity. Clinical trials may involve cytogenetic classification of patients to the appropriate treatment regimens. Currently, the provision of specific assays for acquired neoplasiaspecific genomic changes varies among and within countries as a range of laboratories offer diagnostic solid tumour genetics; these may include Cytogenetic, Pathology, Haematology, and Molecular Genetics laboratories. Technical standards and general guidelines for the analysis and the report of results on most solid tumours are lacking. To address these deficits, a tumour best practice meeting with invited tumour experts without conflict of interest was held on 23rd April 2013 in Oxford, United Kingdom. The aim was to produce professional guidelines for tumour genetic laboratories and to incorporate the standards imposed by generic European guidelines,2 regulatory bodies (ISO15189, 2012 Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence),3 reporting guidelines,4 ISCN,5 and acquired best practice guidelines, while taking into account the current practice in Europe. The guidelines are aimed principally at giving guidance on the minimum, standard cytogenetic analyses, which are applicable to different types of laboratories operating under different regulatory arrangements and are relevant if more specific recommendations are not available. It was universally acknowledged that information on ancillary techniques in use in most cytogenetic laboratories (eg, RTPCR) or advanced techniques not always extensively performed in all laboratories (eg, next-generation sequencing (NGS)) were considered. The process for developing these evidence-based consensus guidelines included agreement on the need of general uniform rules on solid tumour analysis and reporting, discussion on the architecture of the guidelines, working group formation with different tasks (collection, analysis and comparison of any existing guidelines on this subject, type of tumours to be included according to published data and database consultation, method of analysis to be included, report formulation), circulation of the working group activities, formulation and circulation of the initial recommendations, draft and discussion, final consensus, and approval. It is noted that some elements of the tumour diagnostic service not subject to statute may be varied according to local constraints and agreements. Therefore, these guidelines are minimum requirements and additional professional judgment may be of paramount importance under many circumstances. In addition, as new techniques, particularly NGS, as well as clinical evidence, are becoming available all the time, these should be kept under constant review. Notes: The use of ‘must’ in this document indicates a requirement and the use of ‘should’ indicates a recommendation. Where there appears to be contradiction between available guidelines, the most recently published ones should be taken to apply to all. All diagnostic laboratories should be accredited to national or internationally accepted standards (ISO15189).3,6 Laboratories should participate in an External Quality Assessment Scheme7 in all aspects of their service for which a scheme is available.