Back to Search
Start Over
Impact of Substrate Modification by Catheter Ablation on Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Interventions in Patients With Unstable Ventricular Arrhythmias and Coronary Artery Disease: Results From the Multicenter Randomized Controlled SMS (Substrate Modification Study)
- Source :
- Kuck, K-H, Tilz, R R, Deneke, T, Hoffmann, B A, Ventura, R, Hansen, P S, Zarse, M, Hohnloser, S H, Kautzner, J, Willems, S & SMS Investigators 2017, ' Impact of Substrate Modification by Catheter Ablation on Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Interventions in Patients With Unstable Ventricular Arrhythmias and Coronary Artery Disease Results From the Multicenter Randomized Controlled SMS (Substrate Modification Study) ', Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 10, no. 3, 004422 . https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004422
- Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- Background— The implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (ICD) is the standard therapy to prevent sudden cardiac death in patients with coronary artery disease and unstable ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The prospective multinational SMS (Substrate Modification Study) was designed to assess whether prophylactic ablation of the arrhythmogenic substrate reduces or prevents the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in such patients. Methods and Results— Of 111 patients included in an intention-to-treat analysis, 54 were randomly assigned catheter ablation plus ICD implantation (ablation group: 68±8 years; 47 men), whereas 57 were assigned ICD implantation without catheter ablation (ICD-only group: 66±8 years; 46 men). Primary study end point was the time to first recurrence of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. ICD episodes were assessed and verified by an independent board. Patients were followed up for 2.3±1.1 years. The primary end point was reached by 25 ablation patients and 26 ICD-only patients. Two-year event-free survival was estimated at 49.0% (95% confidence interval, 33.3%–62.9%) in the former and 52.4% (36.7%–65.9%) in the latter groups. Comparison of episode incidence revealed no significant difference in the primary end point ( P =0.84). In an Andersen–Gill regression model with multiple end point recurrences, the difference between the study arms significantly favored catheter ablation for both the primary end point and all but one of the predefined subgroups of detected arrhythmia events. Conclusions— SMS failed to meet the primary end point of time to first ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation recurrence. However, catheter ablation did reduce the total number of ICD interventions during the duration of follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration— https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00170287.
- Subjects :
- Male
medicine.medical_treatment
Coronary Artery Disease
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
030204 cardiovascular system & hematology
THERAPY
Severity of Illness Index
Sudden cardiac death
law.invention
SHOCKS
Coronary artery disease
0302 clinical medicine
Randomized controlled trial
law
catheter ablation
030212 general & internal medicine
Substrate modification
TACHYCARDIA ABLATION
Body Surface Potential Mapping
Middle Aged
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
Prognosis
Defibrillators, Implantable
defibrillators, implantable
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Fibrillation
Cardiology
Catheter Ablation
TRIAL
Female
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
coronary artery disease
Adult
medicine.medical_specialty
Catheter ablation
Risk Assessment
Statistics, Nonparametric
03 medical and health sciences
NONISCHEMIC CARDIOMYOPATHY
Physiology (medical)
Internal medicine
medicine
Humans
In patient
Aged
Proportional Hazards Models
business.industry
medicine.disease
PREVENTION
Survival Analysis
Surgery
Death, Sudden, Cardiac
quality of life
MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION
Ventricular fibrillation
Tachycardia, Ventricular
prognosis
business
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 19413084
- Volume :
- 10
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a72daab3ee1b101c90ef28f54f4b517d
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004422