Back to Search
Start Over
Improving quality in a complex primary care system—An example of refugee care and literature review
- Source :
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 27:1018-1026
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Wiley, 2020.
-
Abstract
- RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Applying traditional industrial quality improvement (QI) methodologies to primary care is often inappropriate because primary care and its relationship to the healthcare macrosystem has many features of a complex adaptive system (CAS) that is particularly responsive to bottom-up rather than top-down management approaches. We report on a demonstration case study of improvements made in the Family Health Center (FHC) of the JPS Health Network in a refugee patient population that illustrate features of QI in a CAS framework as opposed to a traditional QI approach. METHODS: We report on changes in health system utilization by new refugee patients of the FHC from 2016 to 2017. We review the literature and summarize relevant theoretical understandings of quality management in complex adaptive systems as it applies to this case example. RESULTS: Applying CAS principles in the FHC, utilization of the Emergency Department and Urgent Care Center by newly arrived refugee patients before their first clinic visit was reduced by more than half (total visits decreased from 31%-14% of the refugee patients). Our review of the literature demonstrates that traditional algorithmic top-down QI processes are most often unsuccessful in improving even a few single-disease metrics, and increases clinician burnout and penalizes clinicians who care for vulnerable patients. Improvement in a CAS occurs when front-line clinicians identify care gaps and are given the flexibility to learn and self-organize to enable new care processes to emerge, which are created from bottom-up leadership that utilize existing interdependencies and interact with the top levels of the organization through intelligent top-down causation. We give examples of early adapters who are better applying the principles of CAS change to their QI efforts. CONCLUSIONS: Meaningful improvement in primary care is more likely achieved when the impetus to implement change shifts from top-down to bottom-up.
- Subjects :
- Clinical governance
Refugees
Quality management
Primary Health Care
business.industry
030503 health policy & services
Health Policy
Refugee
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Health services research
Emergency department
Quality Improvement
Leadership
03 medical and health sciences
Nursing
Health care
Humans
0305 other medical science
business
Complex adaptive system
Psychology
Delivery of Health Care
Health policy
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 13652753 and 13561294
- Volume :
- 27
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a72b24ce2610ebd1b606cf08733c3194
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13430