Back to Search
Start Over
DIABETIC FOOT INFECTION
- Source :
- The Professional Medical Journal. 22:1415-1422
- Publication Year :
- 2015
- Publisher :
- Independent Medical Trust, 2015.
-
Abstract
- Objectives: To determine the frequency of common bacterial isolates cultured from diabetic foot infection in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) falling in Wagner's grade-2 and grade-3 classification of diabetic foot (DF) infection. Study Design: Descriptive study. Period: A six months. Setting: Dow University of health sciences and civil hospital Karachi. Methods: Completed to examine the bacterial identification in cases admitted with the infection diabetic foot along with gave Wagner's evaluation 2 and 3 at tertiary care hospital Karachi. Bacteriological finding and anti-biotic affectability profiles were completed and analyzed with utilizing standard strategies. Results: Out of 115 cases, 82 (71%) were male and 23 (29%) were female. The mean age of patients was 51.7 ±9.45 years, mean duration of diabetes was 10.6 ± 4.73 years, similarly mean length of time of diabetes foot wound was 46.15±23.75 days. 45 (39%) patients had Wegner's evaluation 2 and 70 (61%) patients had Wagner's evaluation 3. 99 cases indicated with culture growth, out of which 65 (65.65%) with gram negative microbes and 25 (25.25%) gram-positive microbes. The most successive bacteria's were Proteus (35.35%), Staph. Aureus (25.25%), Klebsiella (16.16%) and Pseudomonas (15.15%). Both gram positive and gram negative showed frequent resistance to Cloxacillin, Amoxacillin, Levofloxacin, and Linezolid, gram negative life forms likewise indicated high resistance rate to Clindamycin, Vancomycin, and Cefotaxime. Tienam (Imipenem), Sulzone (salbactam in addition to cefoperazone) and Amikacin were the best effective against gram -ve and gram +vemicrobes. Staph. Aureus and Staph. Epidermidis were profoundly susceptible to Ciprofloxacin, Ceftriaxone, Clindamycin, and Vancomycin. Conclusion: Gram negative microbes were more common than gram positive living beings. Proteus, Staph Aureus, Klebsiella and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most widely recognized microorganisms of DF infection. Tienam (Imipenem), Sulzone (salbactam in addition to cefoperazone), and Amikacin were best effective agents.
Details
- ISSN :
- 20717733 and 10248919
- Volume :
- 22
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- The Professional Medical Journal
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a5a8b80a4b162c761e8186d616da7429
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2015.22.11.874