Back to Search Start Over

Feasibility and safety of pulmonary vein isolation by high-power short-duration radiofrequency application: short-term results of the POWER-FAST PILOT study

Authors :
Carlos Escobar
Nerea Gonzalo Bada
José Luis López Sendón
Marcel Martínez Cossiani
Consuelo Froilán Torres
Sergio Castrejón-Castrejón
Marta Ortega Molina
Marta Isabel Díaz de la Torre
José L. Merino
José Manuel Suárez de Parga
Source :
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology. 57:57-65
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2019.

Abstract

Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) by point-by-point radiofrequency application (PPRF) results in longer procedures than that achieved by single-shot ablation techniques. In addition, it is associated with significant risk of oesophageal injury. The POWER-FAST pilot study evaluated the feasibility and safety of PVI by high-power short-duration (HPSD) PPRF.HPSD PPRF around the PVs was done in 48 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation. Fifty watts was delivered until a predefined lesion index value was reached (LSI ≥ 5 or Abl-I ≥ 350) and 60 W during 7-10 s in the first 18 and last 30 patients, respectively. A control group of 47 consecutive patients who had undergone PVI before the HPSD group with conventional PPRF (30 W for 30 s) was included for reference. Echocardiography and oesophageal endoscopy was performed shortly after ablation in all patients.PVI of all targeted veins was achieved in 98% and 100% of patients of the conventional and HPSD groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Total radiofrequency time was 34 ± 11, 24 ± 8, and 15 ± 5 min in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W (p0.001). Audible steam pops occurred in 4 out of 48 (8%) patients in the HPSD group, accounting for 4 (0.08%) out of 5 269 HPSD radiofrequency applications. No patient in the HPSD group developed pericardial effusion. The incidence of oesophageal lesions was 28%, 22%, and 0% in groups 30 W, 50 W, and 60 W, respectively (p = 0.007) CONCLUSIONS: PVI can be achieved with HPSD PPRF in most patients. This approach appears safe and associated with low risk of esophageal damage.

Details

ISSN :
15728595 and 1383875X
Volume :
57
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a59eb219bdd6900477441a2a485974ba
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00645-5