Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of male and female meiotic segregation patterns in translocation heterozygotes: a case study in an animal model (Sus scrofa domestice L.)
- Source :
- Human Reproduction, Human Reproduction, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2005, 20, pp.2476-2482. ⟨10.1093/humrep/dei067⟩
- Publication Year :
- 2005
- Publisher :
- HAL CCSD, 2005.
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: The comparison of male and female meiotic segregation patterns for individuals carrying identical reciprocal translocations has been rarely reported in mammalian species. The main comparative study involving males and females with comparable genetic background has been performed in the mouse. Swine is another relevant animal model species for meiotic studies. Here we present the segregation patterns determined for sows carrying one of the two following reciprocal translocations: 38, XX, rcp(3;15)(q27;q13), and 38, XX, rcp(12;14)(q13;q21). These segregation data were compared to those previously obtained for closely related boars carrying the same balanced chromosomal rearrangements. METHODS: Dual colour in situ hybridization of whole chromosome painting probes was carried out on metaphases of in vitro-matured oocytes II. Segregation results were obtained for 118 and 206 metaphases II respectively for the two translocations. RESULTS: Significant differences between sexes were demonstrated for both rearrangements. For instance, for the 3/15 translocation, the chromosomally unbalanced gametes were of different origin: preponderance of the adjacent-I segregation in the male (31.4%), and of the adjacent-II (14.3%) and 3:1 (14.3%) segregations in females. For the 12/14 translocation, the proportion of balanced gametes was greater in males than in females (75.9 and 59.4% respectively). CONCLUSION: This study is a new scientific contribution to compare the segregation patterns of male and female carriers of identical chromosomal rearrangements. The results obtained are consistent with those previously reported in mice. Hypotheses to interpret the observed differences between the two translocations, as well as between the male and female segregation patterns, are formulated and discussed.
- Subjects :
- Male
Heterozygote
[SDV.OT]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Other [q-bio.OT]
X Chromosome
Sus scrofa
Chromosomal translocation
Biology
Whole chromosome
Translocation, Genetic
Loss of heterozygosity
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Animal model
Meiosis
Chromosome Segregation
[SDV.BC.IC]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular Biology/Cell Behavior [q-bio.CB]
[SDV.MHEP.PHY]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Human health and pathology/Tissues and Organs [q-bio.TO]
Animals
Mitotic Metaphase
Lymphocytes
Metaphase
030304 developmental biology
Genetics
0303 health sciences
Sex Characteristics
030219 obstetrics & reproductive medicine
Rehabilitation
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Heterozygote advantage
Chromosomes, Mammalian
Sus scrofa domestica
Reproductive Medicine
Models, Animal
Oocytes
Female
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 02681161 and 14602350
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Human Reproduction, Human Reproduction, Oxford University Press (OUP), 2005, 20, pp.2476-2482. ⟨10.1093/humrep/dei067⟩
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi.dedup.....a56ec08b226640ea3bf12460031dcbfa
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei067⟩