Back to Search Start Over

Barriers and facilitators to implementing priority inpatient initiatives in the safety net setting

Authors :
Mari-Lynn Drainoni
Erika L. Crable
Dea L. Biancarelli
Allan J. Walkey
Source :
Implementation Science Communications, Implementation Science Communications, Vol 1, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.

Abstract

Background Safety net hospitals, which serve vulnerable and underserved populations and often operate on smaller budgets than non-safety net hospitals, may experience unique implementation challenges. We sought to describe common barriers and facilitators that affect the implementation of improvement initiatives in a safety net hospital, and identify potentially transferable lessons to enhance implementation efforts in similar settings. Methods We interviewed leaders within five inpatient departments and asked them to identify the priority inpatient improvement initiative from the last year. We then conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with 25 stakeholders across the five settings. Interviewees included individuals serving in implementation oversight, champion, and frontline implementer roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research informed the discussion guide and a priori codes for directed content analysis. Results Despite pursuing diverse initiatives in different clinical departments, safety net hospital improvement stakeholders described common barriers and facilitators related to inner and outer setting dynamics, characteristics of individuals involved, and implementation processes. Implementation barriers included (1) limited staffing resources, (2) organizational recognition without financial investment, and (3) the use of implementation strategies that did not adequately address patients’ biopsychosocial complexities. Facilitators included (1) implementation approaches that combined passive and active communication styles, (2) knowledge of patient needs and competitive pressure to perform well against non-SNHs, (3) stakeholders’ personal commitment to reduce health inequities, and (4) the use of multidisciplinary task forces to drive implementation activities. Conclusion Inner and outer setting dynamics, individual’s characteristics, and process factors served as implementation barriers and facilitators within the safety net. Future work should seek to leverage findings from this study toward efforts to enact positive change within safety net hospitals.

Details

ISSN :
26622211
Volume :
1
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Implementation Science Communications
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a4d859608955f048904f431d22a9d2df
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00024-6