Back to Search Start Over

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene and Protein and Gefitinib Sensitivity in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Authors :
Elisa Rossi
Elisabetta Magrini
Wilbur A. Franklin
Giovanni Luca Ceresoli
I. Domenichini
Samir E. Witta
Kathleen D. Danenberg
Fred R. Hirsch
Maurizio Tonato
Lucio Crinò
Vanesa Gregorc
Vienna Ludovini
Angelo Sidoni
Marileila Varella-Garcia
Stefania Bartolini
Federico Cappuzzo
Jerry Haney
Lynne T. Bemis
Claudio Doglioni
Paul A. Bunn
Cappuzzo, F
Hirsch, Fr
Rossi, E
Bartolini, S
Ceresoli, Gl
Bemis, L
Haney, J
Witta, S
Danenberg, K
Domenichini, I
Ludovini, V
Magrini, E
Gregorc, V
Doglioni, Claudio
Sidoni, A
Tonato, M
Franklin, Wa
Crino, L
Bunn, Pa
Varella Garcia, M.
Source :
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 97:643-655
Publication Year :
2005
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2005.

Abstract

Background: Gefitinib is a selective inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase, which is overexpressed in many cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We carried out a clinical study to compare the relationship between EGFR gene copy number, EGFR protein expression, EGFR mutations, and Akt activation status as predictive markers for gefitinib therapy in advanced NSCLC. Methods: Tumors from 102 NSCLC patients treated daily with 250 mg of gefitinib were evaluated for EGFR status by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), DNA sequencing, and immunohistochemistry and for Akt activation status (phospho-Akt [P-Akt]) by immunohistochemistry. Time to progression, overall survival, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method; groups were compared using the log-rank test. Risk factors associated with survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling and multivariable analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Amplification or high polysomy of the EGFR gene (seen in 33 of 102 patients) and high protein expression (seen in 58 of 98 patients) were statistically significantly associated with better response (36% versus 3%, mean difference = 34%, 95% CI = 16.6 to 50.3; P

Details

ISSN :
14602105 and 00278874
Volume :
97
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a45714cdbfd5785993105b6f0db8ef9e