Back to Search Start Over

Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2

Authors :
Andy Schnaubelt
Hannah M. Creager
Jesse L. Cox
Meei Li Huang
Barbara J Cabrera
Allison M. Cushman-Vokoun
Paul D. Fey
Salika M. Shakir
Margarita Rogatcheva
Keith D. Tardif
Steven H. Hinrichs
Usha Spaulding
Alexander L. Greninger
Kevin M. Bourzac
Daria Drobysheva
Keith R. Jerome
Mara J. Broadhurst
Source :
Journal of Clinical Virology
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V., 2020.

Abstract

Highlights • BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1 SARS-CoV-2 assay high sensitivity and specificity. • Comparable performance to gold standard tests for low level viral RNA detection. • Rapid, sample-to-answer, syndromic testing for respiratory pathogens with SARS-CoV-2.<br />We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of nasopharyngeal swab specimens have a SARS CoV-2 Ct >30 and thus detection of virus in low titers is clinically relevant, a sample with a high titer was diluted and each 10 fold dilution was tested in triplicate and compared against 6 other EUA approved SARS CoV-2 assays. These data suggested that the BioFire® RP2.1 panel, along with four other SARS CoV-2 assays (Roche cobas, Cepheid Xpert Xpress, BioFire® Defense COVID19, and NECoV19), consistently detected viral RNA at the 10−7 dilution. Overall, these studies suggest that the BioFire® RP2.1 assay can be used to detect acute cases of SARS CoV2 in addition to patients with low viral titer later in disease presentation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18735967 and 13866532
Volume :
129
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Virology
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....a40eccf670a6ddbe7b7a05a1689e6509